📍 Explore our State and District Continuing Education Approvals →
NASET
Topics

Topics

See all in Topics
Library
Publications

Journals and news

Series

Handouts and guides

See all in Publications
Resources

For your classroom

Learn more

See all in Resources
Certifications

Board certifications

Courses and programs

See all in Certifications
Career Center

Find a job

Grow your career

For employers

See all in Career Center
Membership

Join

Members

See all in Membership
Awards

NASET Awards

See all in Awards
About

About NASET

Work with NASET

See all in About

No Child Left Behind’s Implementation in Urban School Settings: Implications for Serving Students with Emotional and Behavior Disorders

JAASEP FALL 2007 Part 4 of 7
All series

Although the prospect of schools being held to higher achievement standards, and thus producing better student outcomes, is universally appealing, to date very little is known about NCLB‟s actual impact on student outcomes. Further, despite the enormous number of books, book chapters, and articles describing its legal and conceptual underpinnings, little is known about the NCLB‟s practical implications for how we educate groups of students targeted in the Act (Rose & Gallup, 2003), and particularly one of its target groups: students with disabilities. For example, there appears to be little if anything in the extant literature, some five years after its enactment, regarding the implications the Act has for students identified as having emotional and or behavioral disorders (EBD), particularly those students served in urban school settings. Thus, our intent in this paper is to briefly review the major principles of NCLB and then to provide a context and discuss implications for NCLB‟s role in improving educational and social outcomes for students identified as emotionally and behaviorally disturbed (EBD) who are being served in urban school environments.

Abstract

The No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB, 2002) has generated controversy and support since its inception. Parents, teachers, researchers, authors, advocates, protesters, and politicians have shared views and opinions based on “political” beliefs, biases, and anecdotal and research-based evidence that supports their stance. In attempt to sidestep political attacks or endorsements of NCLB, we reviewed the literature regarding NCLB’s basic principles, its issues in urban school settings, and its impact on students identified as emotionally and behaviorally disturbed who receive special education services in urban school settings. We also discussed relevant recommendations, methods, and strategies to increase a school’s capacity and student outcomes.

Scroll to Top