JAASEP FALL 2007 Part 3 of 7
All series
- ADHD Series
- Assessment in Special Education Series
- Autism Spectrum Disorders Series
- Bullying of Children
- Classroom Management Series
- Diagnosis of Students with Disabilities and Disorders Series
- Discipline of Students in Special Education Series
- Early Intervention Series
- Genetics in Special Education Series
- How To Series
- IEP Components
- Inclusion Series
- JAASEP – Research Based Journal in Special Education
- LD Report
- Lesser Known Disorders
- NASET News Alert
- NASET Q & A Corner
- NASET Survival Guides
- Parent Teacher Conference Handouts
- Resolving Disputes with Parents Series
- RTI Roundtable
- Severe Disabilities Series
- Special Education: What Do the Latest Numbers Tell Us?
- Special Educator e-Journal – Latest and Archived Issues
- The Practical Teacher
- Treatment and Support for IEP Students with Disabilities
- Working with Paraprofessionals in Your School
Administrators, consultants, and other service personnel in the schools often encounter resistance to the use of idea of using a reinforcement program to intervene with inappropriate behaviors or poor academic performance. This attitude becomes a problem when the offenders undermine a potentially successful intervention, or even refuse outright to participate. As child advocates, we are then placed in a very frustrating position: how do we combat this brick wall of resistance? And do we even have the right to interfere, when it appears, as it sometimes does, to be a cultural phenomenon? The purpose of this article, then, is to discuss some of the causes of resistance to reinforcement programs, and to propose some means of coping with those who present this attitude.
“They should do it because they are supposed to do it!”
Most people who assert this really mean, “They should be afraid NOT to do it!” In the United States, this belief has its roots deep in the traditions of its earliest European settlers. Many were religious zealots whose God was a wrathful and punishing being; the imminent danger of hell figured prominently in their daily life.
Abstract
One of the most frustrating situations encountered by special needs professionals is when teachers are unwilling to carry out individualized reinforcement plans for children. Though they are clearly required by law to comply, some individuals still resist our most determined efforts at advocacy. The purpose of this paper is to examine some possible causes of such resistance, and to offer some suggestions for working with these troublesome individuals.