JAASEP SPRING/SUMMER 2026 Part 1 of 7
All series
- ADHD Series
- Assessment in Special Education Series
- Autism Spectrum Disorders Series
- Bullying of Children
- Classroom Management Series
- Diagnosis of Students with Disabilities and Disorders Series
- Discipline of Students in Special Education Series
- Early Intervention Series
- Genetics in Special Education Series
- How To Series
- IEP Components
- Inclusion Series
- JAASEP – Research Based Journal in Special Education
- LD Report
- Lesser Known Disorders
- NASET News Alert
- NASET Q & A Corner
- NASET Survival Guides
- Parent Teacher Conference Handouts
- Resolving Disputes with Parents Series
- RTI Roundtable
- Severe Disabilities Series
- Special Education: What Do the Latest Numbers Tell Us?
- Special Educator e-Journal – Latest and Archived Issues
- The Practical Teacher
- Treatment and Support for IEP Students with Disabilities
- Working with Paraprofessionals in Your School
Since the Education of All Handicapped Children Act, 1975 (PL 94-142), curricular frameworks for students with extensive support needs (ESN) have evolved considerably. Students with ESN may be classified with disabilities including autism, intellectual disability, or multiple disabilities, and are often eligible for a state’s alternate assessment. Conceptions of what constitutes good and meaningful education for students with ESN have been shaped by legal mandates, personcentered approaches to curriculum planning, and evidenced-based practices, including a shift from developmental approaches to an ecological and standardsbased model that have implications for students’ quality of life and emancipation (Hunt et al., 2012). The 2004 amendment to the Individuals with Disabilities in Education Act further requires students with disabilities be educated in the Least Restrictive Environment and participate in the general education curriculum and standards-based assessment. As a result, ESN teachers serving students with ESN are expected to deliver evidence-based, standards-aligned instruction for literacy, math, and science (e.g., Browder & Spooner, 2014) alongside intensive social and behavior supports (McDonnell et al., 2015).
As expectations expand, ESN teachers’ responsibilities have grown accordingly—yet the supports necessary to enact such reforms have not kept pace.
Abstract
Job demands and poor working conditions of special education teachers are one of the main reasons for teacher attrition, one of the most pressing issues in special education today. This study explored the job characteristics and working conditions specific to special education teachers of students with extensive support needs. Sixty-six special education teachers completed a survey of 74 job tasks, indicating the importance of each task, their confidence level, and available time and materials. The results confirmed the importance of 73 out of the 74 tasks. The analysis of the working conditions yielded six patterns, the largest pattern consisting of 35 tasks that were perceived as important but for which the teachers lacked the confidence, time, and materials for implementation. The findings are discussed in the context of demoralization of special education teachers, as well as in terms of school district policies and training of teachers in special education.
