The Power of the Paraprofessional: Investigating Self-Efficacy and the Importance of Ongoing Professional Development

JAASEP FALL 2026 Part 5 of 9
All series

Schools across the country rely heavily on paraeducators to support the delivery of special education services for students with disabilities (SWDs), employing nearly 470,000 paraeducators to support the academic, social, and behavioral development of students (Fisher & Pleasants, 2012; U.S. Department of Education, 2021). Although prior research shows that paraeducators can implement high-impact strategies with fidelity when provided experiential training or coaching, paraeducators often lack formal training in implementing evidence-based practices (Borosh et al., 2023). Although the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) permits appropriately trained and supervised paraprofessionals to assist in providing special education and related services in accordance with state requirements, it does not prescribe the breadth, frequency, and rigor of such training and supervision (IDEA, 2004). In fact, previous studies with paraeducators, teachers, and administrators indicate the type and amount of training paraeducators receive to support students with disabilities is often inadequate, and in some cases nonexistent (Mason et al., 2021; Sobeck & Robertson, 2019; Wiggs et al., 2021; Zobell & Hwang, 2020). Students with significant support needs may receive support from paraprofessionals who have had limited preparation to implement evidence-based practices (Carter et al., 2009; Fisher & Pleasants, 2012; Riggs & Mueller, 2001).

Abstract

The rising number of students with disabilities, along with the decreasing number of teachers, has made the role of the paraeducator increasingly important. Paraeducators enter the workforce with varying degrees of experience and knowledge, making the creation of targeted professional development programming necessary. Often, though, the training needs of paraeducators are found to be inadequate, leaving the provision of training to the teachers who are generally underprepared to work with paraeducators. This lack of preparation and collaboration could result in an ineffective implementation of inclusive support within the general education classroom for students with disabilities and could leave paraeducators feeling disconnected from the school community. A correlation analysis identified strong, positive relationships among the three areas measured by the TSES subscales, indicating that as we provide paraeducators support in one area of self-efficacy, their overall confidence to support students with disabilities in a variety of settings increases. This implies that when paraeducators are included in professional development programming, they are better able to implement instructional and behavior management strategies with high fidelity and have a higher sense of belonging and self-efficacy.

Scroll to Top