JAASEP SPRING/SUMMER 2025 Part 1 of 11
All series
- ADHD Series
- Assessment in Special Education Series
- Autism Spectrum Disorders Series
- Bullying of Children
- Classroom Management Series
- Diagnosis of Students with Disabilities and Disorders Series
- Discipline of Students in Special Education Series
- Early Intervention Series
- Genetics in Special Education Series
- How To Series
- IEP Components
- Inclusion Series
- JAASEP – Research Based Journal in Special Education
- LD Report
- Lesser Known Disorders
- NASET News Alert
- NASET Q & A Corner
- NASET Survival Guides
- Parent Teacher Conference Handouts
- Resolving Disputes with Parents Series
- RTI Roundtable
- Severe Disabilities Series
- Special Education: What Do the Latest Numbers Tell Us?
- Special Educator e-Journal – Latest and Archived Issues
- The Practical Teacher
- Treatment and Support for IEP Students with Disabilities
- Working with Paraprofessionals in Your School
More students with disabilities are enrolling in higher education than ever before. During that 2015–16 academic year, 19% of male undergraduates and 20% of female undergraduates reported having a disability (Bureau of Labor Statistics, 2016). In 2022, 15% of college students reported having attention deficit disorder (ADD) or attention deficit and hyperactivity disorder (American College Health Association, 2022). Conversely, in 1978—3 years after the passage of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act—only 2.6% of undergraduates reported a disability (NCES, 2003). As more students enter college, policy makers, researchers, and higher education leaders are increasingly shifting their focus toward success outcomes such as academic achievement, college persistence, degree receipt, and return on investment. In 2015, for example, the Obama administration launched the college scorecard to give students and families data about colleges, such as costs, graduation rate, loan default rate, average amount borrowed, and post completion employment; in doing so, the administration argued that the key to boosting college completion was ensuring that students and families had information to support them in applying to a school that would help students achieve their educational goals (U.S. Department of Education, 2016). Similar efforts have been echoed across state governments.
Abstract
The purpose of this study was to determine the antecedent conditions that contribute to completion of postsecondary education (PSE) for students with disabilities, taking into account institutional experiences associated with the development of social integration. A prospective longitudinal design was used to analyze data from the National Longitudinal Transition Study-2 (NLTS2). Findings indicate that PSE completion was significantly predicted by self-advocacy, participation in a work-study program or paid employment, participation in extracurricular activities, and development of vocational skills as a primary transition goal. Transition practitioners should consider the right constellation of factors known to impact the PSE outcomes of youth with disabilities including, self-advocacy and transition goals.
