📍 Explore our State and District Continuing Education Approvals →
NASET
Topics

Topics

See all in Topics
Library
Publications

Journals and news

Series

Handouts and guides

See all in Publications
Resources

For your classroom

Learn more

See all in Resources
Certifications

Board certifications

Courses and programs

See all in Certifications
Career Center

Find a job

Grow your career

For employers

See all in Career Center
Membership

Join

Members

See all in Membership
Awards

NASET Awards

See all in Awards
About

About NASET

Work with NASET

See all in About

Individualized Interventions: When Teachers Resist

JAASEP FALL 2007 Part 3 of 7
All series

Administrators, consultants, and other service personnel in the schools often encounter resistance to the use of idea of using a reinforcement program to intervene with inappropriate behaviors or poor academic performance. This attitude becomes a problem when the offenders undermine a potentially successful intervention, or even refuse outright to participate. As child advocates, we are then placed in a very frustrating position: how do we combat this brick wall of resistance? And do we even have the right to interfere, when it appears, as it sometimes does, to be a cultural phenomenon? The purpose of this article, then, is to discuss some of the causes of resistance to reinforcement programs, and to propose some means of coping with those who present this attitude.

“They should do it because they are supposed to do it!”

Most people who assert this really mean, “They should be afraid NOT to do it!” In the United States, this belief has its roots deep in the traditions of its earliest European settlers. Many were religious zealots whose God was a wrathful and punishing being; the imminent danger of hell figured prominently in their daily life.

Abstract

One of the most frustrating situations encountered by special needs professionals is when teachers are unwilling to carry out individualized reinforcement plans for children. Though they are clearly required by law to comply, some individuals still resist our most determined efforts at advocacy. The purpose of this paper is to examine some possible causes of such resistance, and to offer some suggestions for working with these troublesome individuals.

Scroll to Top