JAASEP WINTER 2009 Part 1 of 7
All series
- ADHD Series
- Assessment in Special Education Series
- Autism Spectrum Disorders Series
- Bullying of Children
- Classroom Management Series
- Diagnosis of Students with Disabilities and Disorders Series
- Discipline of Students in Special Education Series
- Early Intervention Series
- Genetics in Special Education Series
- How To Series
- IEP Components
- Inclusion Series
- JAASEP – Research Based Journal in Special Education
- LD Report
- Lesser Known Disorders
- NASET News Alert
- NASET Q & A Corner
- NASET Survival Guides
- Parent Teacher Conference Handouts
- Resolving Disputes with Parents Series
- RTI Roundtable
- Severe Disabilities Series
- Special Education: What Do the Latest Numbers Tell Us?
- Special Educator e-Journal – Latest and Archived Issues
- The Practical Teacher
- Treatment and Support for IEP Students with Disabilities
- Working with Paraprofessionals in Your School
Students with attention disorders are challenged by the attention and working memory demands required to successfully solve math story problems. Their attentional differences can be understood through the optimal stimulation theory that suggests these students are biologically under-stimulated (Zentall, 2006). According to the optimal stimulation theory, each human has a biologically determined level of optimal stimulation and when insufficiently stimulated, will initiate stimulation-seeking activity to create a state of homeostasis, or a comfort zone of optimal stimulation (Hebb, 1955). Zentall (1983) applied this theory to students with attention disorders and provided an understanding of students’ inability to sustain attention in lower stimulating environments. They attend to that which is immediately salient in the environment and not their tasks, resulting in difficulty with sustained attention (Zentall, 1995).
Students with attention difficulties can pay attention; their problems have to do with what they are paying attention to and for how long. Any strong stimulus can captivate their attention and distract them from their tasks. They selectively attend to novelty such as, color, changes in size, and movement (Copeland & Wisniewski, 1981; Radosh & Gittelman, 1981).
Abstract
Using a single-subject alternating treatments reversal design, the effects of three conditions, tactile stimulation, auditory stimulation, and choice of the two, were compared on the math story problem solving of elementary students with attention problems. Students attempted and solved slightly more problems and engaged in fewer off-task behaviors in the stimulation conditions than in baseline. Effects were very modest. Students chose stimulation conditions that were related to their behavior more than their accuracy.
