📍 Explore our State and District Continuing Education Approvals →
NASET
Topics

Topics

See all in Topics
Library
Publications

Journals and news

Series

Handouts and guides

See all in Publications
Resources

For your classroom

Learn more

See all in Resources
Certifications

Board certifications

Courses and programs

See all in Certifications
Career Center

Find a job

Grow your career

For employers

See all in Career Center
Membership

Join

Members

See all in Membership
Awards

NASET Awards

See all in Awards
About

About NASET

Work with NASET

See all in About

Guidelines for the Administration of Educational Programs for Students who are Deaf/Hard of Hearing, Visually Impaired, or Deafblind

JAASEP FALL 2016 Part 7 of 13
All series

A hearing loss, visual impairment or deafblindness (the combination of hearing loss and visual impairment of any type or degree) potentially interferes with typical ways of interacting and learning. Students with these sensory disabilities comprise less than two percent of all children and youth with disabilities and only two-tenths of one percent of the entire school-age population (U.S. Department of Education, National Center on Education Statistics (NCES), 2012). Such a low prevalence results in some districts having very little experience with students who have sensory impairments. This lack of experience may lead to misunderstandings, lower expectations, and a lack of knowledge about evidence-based practices. The authors of this paper reviewed the research literature in their respective fields of deaf/hard of hearing, visual impairment (including blindness), and deafblindness for high quality research that met the standards of evidence established by the Collaboration for Effective Educator Development, Accountability, and Reform (CEEDAR) Center, University of Florida. This Center was funded to provide technical assistance to state education agencies (SEAs), institutions of higher education (IHEs), and local education agencies (LEAs) to increase alignment in professional learning systems (i.e., certification/license, preparation, program evaluations) to enhance learning opportunities for teachers and leaders.

Abstract

This paper presents the essential programming components resulting from a systematic review of research studies, legislation, and policy documents on the topic of administration issues in educational programming for students who are deaf/hard of hearing, visually impaired, or deafblind. It is recommended that educational teams should include a member whose educational preparation and credential matches the disability of the student who is deaf/hard of hearing, visually impaired, or deafblind to support assessment and instructional programming. Additional recommendations including limiting the caseloads of itinerant teachers of students with visual impairment to 8-20 and limiting the size of groupings that include children who are deafblind to support access and engagement. With the exception of the caseload recommendation, which is at the limited evidence level, all other essential programming components were determined to have an emerging level of evidence. The heterogeneity, low prevalence, and geographic disbursement of these disability groups create challenges for conducting educational research.

Scroll to Top