JAASEP SPRING 2006 Part 5 of 5
All series
- ADHD Series
- Assessment in Special Education Series
- Autism Spectrum Disorders Series
- Bullying of Children
- Classroom Management Series
- Diagnosis of Students with Disabilities and Disorders Series
- Discipline of Students in Special Education Series
- Early Intervention Series
- Genetics in Special Education Series
- How To Series
- IEP Components
- Inclusion Series
- JAASEP – Research Based Journal in Special Education
- LD Report
- Lesser Known Disorders
- NASET News Alert
- NASET Q & A Corner
- NASET Survival Guides
- Parent Teacher Conference Handouts
- Resolving Disputes with Parents Series
- RTI Roundtable
- Severe Disabilities Series
- Special Education: What Do the Latest Numbers Tell Us?
- Special Educator e-Journal – Latest and Archived Issues
- The Practical Teacher
- Treatment and Support for IEP Students with Disabilities
- Working with Paraprofessionals in Your School
The principles of continuous improvement are currently impacting all areas of society. Business, government, and educational organizations are all applying these principles to improve the delivery of services to their customers (Payne and Blackbourn,1992). Lynch and Kordis (1988) emphasize the need to search constantly for the next stage in an ongoing sequence of continuous improvement. These modifications often involve change that is revolutionary, innovative, and involves fundamental modifications (Blackbourn, Papasan, Vinson, & Blackbourn, 2000; Kuhn, 1962; 1976; 1990). In essence, improving service delivery is not a final goal or destination, but merely a step in a continuing journey.
Fundamental change in operational procedures is the key element in significant improvement (Blackbourn, Papasan, Vinson, & Blackbourn, 2000; Skirtic, 1991; Synge, 1990). Much of the reason for the lack of meaningful change has to do with the standards and framework upon which the improvements are based. Using experience which is not current as a guide for problem solving is analogous to driving a car while only looking in the rearview mirror (Deming, 1987). Knowing how problems were dealt with in the past may not be helpful in solving current problems, especially if one’s vision is not futuristic or forward reaching.
Abstract
This article outlines innovative approaches to reducing dropouts and enhancing the rate of school success among students labeled “At-Risk”. The article emphasizes the need for fundamental change in educational philosophy and operational frameworks as the basis for meaningful change. Significant aspects of the processes used to improve student outcomes are provided.