JAASEP SPECIAL ISSUE 2026 Part 1 of 5
All series
- ADHD Series
- Assessment in Special Education Series
- Autism Spectrum Disorders Series
- Bullying of Children
- Classroom Management Series
- Diagnosis of Students with Disabilities and Disorders Series
- Discipline of Students in Special Education Series
- Early Intervention Series
- Genetics in Special Education Series
- How To Series
- IEP Components
- Inclusion Series
- JAASEP – Research Based Journal in Special Education
- LD Report
- Lesser Known Disorders
- NASET News Alert
- NASET Q & A Corner
- NASET Survival Guides
- Parent Teacher Conference Handouts
- Resolving Disputes with Parents Series
- RTI Roundtable
- Severe Disabilities Series
- Special Education: What Do the Latest Numbers Tell Us?
- Special Educator e-Journal – Latest and Archived Issues
- The Practical Teacher
- Treatment and Support for IEP Students with Disabilities
- Working with Paraprofessionals in Your School
Behavioral interpretation plays a critical role in early childhood and special education systems because perceptions of children’s behavior often influence referral decisions, intervention planning, disciplinary responses, and access to support (Dunlap et al., 2006; Sanches-Ferreira et al., 2013; Sheppard & Moran, 2022; Stormont & Young-Walker, 2017). Negative outcomes of young children with prolonged, disruptive behaviors have been extensively documented. Prolonged behavioral issues are a strong indicator of poor academic performance and early withdrawal from school (Breitenstein et al., 2009; Conroy & Brown, 2004; Popham et al., 2018). Additionally, students displaying disruptive behaviors can engage in delinquency and difficulties in forming interpersonal relationships or developing secure attachments, especially among young children (Bowman-Perrott et al., 2013; Koglin and Petermann, 2011; Skiba 2000; Studts et al., 2013). Young children displaying these behaviors who are three and older, particularly African American males, face a higher likelihood of being suspended or expelled from early childhood programs (Chow et al., 2021; Gilliam, 2005). Such disciplinary actions not only lead to a loss of instructional time but also limit opportunities for social-emotional development.
Abstract
This study investigates early childhood educators ability to distinguish between developmentally appropriate and disruptive behaviors in diverse early education settings. Utilizing a Delphi method with a panel of experts, the research explores concepts of behavioral interpretation, collaborative decision-making, and developmentally informed intervention planning across Wakschlag’s developmental domains: Emotional Regulation, Internalization of Rules, Aggression Modulation, and Empathy and Conscience. Findings highlight the persistent challenges interdisciplinary teams may face in identifying nuanced behavioral differences, compounded by cultural and individual variability. The study underscores the need for structured developmental frameworks that support collaborative, developmentally informed decision-making within early childhood and special education settings.