Laura Kern, JD, Ph.D.
Heather Peshak George, Ph.D.
Lauren L. Evanovich, Ph.D.
Stephanie Martinez, Ph.D.
University of South Florida
Abstract
The Supreme Court case of Endrew F. v. Douglas County District RE-1 (2017) has renewed interest in the Free and Appropriate Public Education (FAPE) mandate of the Individuals with Disabilities Act (IDEA). The court’s ruling expands the term “appropriate” to a consideration of progress for academics and behavior. This shift has significance to many who work with students with disabilities in schools. Specifically, special educators will need to ensure that they are assessing and monitoring academics and behavioral, such as incorporating functional behavior assessments (FBAs) into the development of appropriate behavior intervention plans (BIPs) and considering overall progress during Individualized Education Programs (IEP) development. This paper will address the history of IDEA, its connection with FAPE, and discuss the seminal cases of Rowley and Endrew F. and their implications for IEP teams. Considerations and recommendations for addressing FAPE for students will be provided, focusing on implications for the IEP, Multi-tiered Systems of Support (MTSS), and Behavior Intervention Plans (BIPs).
Keywords: Endrew F., IDEA, FAPE, behavior intervention plan, MTSS, IEP, special educators
Read or Download Instructions
-
To Read or Download this Article – Click Here
-
To Download the SPRING-SUMMER 2019 Issue of JAASEP – Click Here
