July 2020 – Special Educator e-Journal




­

Special Education Legal Alert

By Perry A. Zirkel

© June 2020

This month’s update concerns two issues that were subject to recent court decisions of general significance: (a) FAPE in a dyslexia methodology case, and (b) parents who proceed in due process hearings without an attorney.  For further examination of such issues, see Publications section at perryzirkel.com

In Preciado v. Board of Education of Clovis Municipal Schools (2020), a federal district court addressed the FAPE claims of a sixth grader with a diagnosis of dyslexia and an IEP for specific learning disabilities (SLD).  In grade 4, the IEP included 300 minutes per week of specialized reading instruction, which her special ed teacher provided via Read Naturally and Orton-Gillingham (OG).  The district used the Istation program to track her reading progress.  The same level of services continued in grade 5 until April, when a reevaluation determined that she no longer qualified as SLD despite being two years below grade level in reading.  The parent promptly filed for a due process hearing, which kept her IEP in place during grade 6, when the impartial hearing officer (IHO) issued a decision in her favor and the district appealed to federal court.

First, the court affirmed the IHO’s ruling that the district committed a prejudicial procedural violation by relying on Istation scores in reviewing and revising the IEP without properly explaining them to the parent.

This ruling serves as a reminder that denial of FAPE may be based on significantly impeding the parent’s opportunity to participate in IEP meetings.  Interestingly too, the IHO’s remedy for this violation, which the district did not separately challenge, was to hire a facilitator and pay for an advocate for the parent’s future IEP meetings.

Second, the court also affirmed the IHO’s ruling that the district did not meet the Endrew F. substantive standard of “appropriate progress” by failing to present a cogent explanation why the student could not read at grade level.

The reasons included (a) the grade 4 teacher’s lack of training in dyslexia and O-G, (b) the grade 5 teacher’s substantial failure to implement the IEP services, and (c) the repeated or reduced goals and services despite an identified need for “urgent intervention.”  The court rejected the district’s deference argument, distinguishing implementation from choice of methodology.

Third, the court upheld the IHO’s remedy of compensatory education for the FAPE denials in grades 4–5, which included keeping the student in special education at least through grade 6 and one year of specified 1:1 OG-based services.

The court used the qualitative approach that started with Reid v. D.C. (2005), concluding that the IHO sufficiently explained, despite the lack of detail, the award of compensatory education placed the child in the position she would have occupied but for the district’s denial of FAPE and was appropriate in light of the IDEA’s purposes.

The full court decision makes for a good read because it extends to notable issues, including absenteeism, and is different from most of the dyslexia methodology cases (as canvassed in the latest downloadable article under “RTI/MTSS and SLD” on my website). 

Two separate court decisions in Virginia illustrate problems that sometimes arise when parents proceed in due process hearings either with a lay advocate or “pro se,” i.e., on their own.  In Henrico County School Board v. Matthews (2019), lay advocates represented them, which Virginia law permits.  The hearing officer ruled in the parents’ favor, ordering the district to provide a private placement for their child with autism as compensatory relief.  Soon after, the district filed an appeal, the parents moved their residence to another district.  One of the two lay advocates stayed active, which included (a) advising the parents their move would not affect the private school order and, thus, they need not tell the court; (b) filing for a seventh due process hearing, all for the same child and issues, to cause the district to “listen”; and (c) making false sworn statements as part of the court’s discovery process.  Upon learning that the parents had moved, the district filed a motion to dismiss the case as moot, which the parties agreed to do, and to sanction the parents and the advocate, which was subject to further proceedings.  In Chesterfield County SchoolBoard v. Williams (2020), the parent proceeded pro se, filing for a due process hearing and, within a few weeks, agreeing to a settlement with the district.  The agreement specified that the district provide certain services to the child and that the parent not file further due process complaints about events prior to the settlement date.  However, three months later the parent filed for another hearing on events within that proscribed period.  The district filed an enforcement action, and she filed a motion for dismissal.

For the motion against the lay advocate in the Henrico County case, the court found sanctionable only the false sworn statements.  In contrast, the advice about the move was not frivolous in light of mixed judicial authority.  Similarly, the scorched earth policy, although “reprehensible,” was not meritless in light of the favorable hearing officer’s decision.

In light of the various applicable factors, including the extent of culpability and the public interest, and the lay advocate’s financial circumstances, the court ordered her to pay $1,000 and to not allow her to participate in any future IDEA proceedings at this court.  The district’s request for her to pay its attorneys’ fees was not deemed fitting in this case.

For the motion against the parents in the Henrico County case, the court declined to order sanctions, concluding that they had engaged in misconduct but that it was largely attributable to the advice of the lay advocate.

Although the parents’ escaped sanctions, their extensive efforts on behalf of their child in this case went for naught, and they incurred inferable major emotional and fiscal costs based on not only the due process hearing but the sanctions proceedings.

In the Chesterfield County case, the court denied the parent’s motion to dismiss the case, finding that the school district had met the three threshold elements of a breach of contract claim under Virginia law: (a) a legally enforceable agreement; (b) breach of the agreement; and (c) a resulting injury to the other party.

Separately, the court issued a preliminary injunction enforcing the agreement pending a final decision.  For both this purpose and the injury element for the contract claim, the court cited the  undue costs and personnel disruption for the district.  Yet, the case is not over; the decision and any remedy await further proceedings.

The bottom line is that in some cases parents understandably choose to proceed without an attorney for various reasons, including the high emotions in trying to do the best for one’s child and the lack of affordable specialized parent attorneys in many places. 

The choice of a lay advocate or to proceed pro se may compound the original dispute in some cases and may resolve it in

others.  Increasing the availability and efficacy of the options for parents appears to be necessary and appropriate.

To top


Buzz from the Hub

All articles below can be accessed through the following links:

https://www.parentcenterhub.org/buzz-from-the-hub/

 

For Parent Centers and Other Nonprofits

Comparison Guide: Video Conferencing Tools for Your Nonprofit
As nonprofits continue to do their work remotely, the need for a solid video conferencing tool has never been greater. TechSoup created this at-a-glance guide to help nonprofits make informed decisions about choosing what’s right for their organization.

Tech Soup Courses for Free!
TechSoup has also created a free track of courses to provide information and tools as nonprofits scale up the work they do remotely, including having necessary tech tools, how to boost collaboration, and how to ensure information security.

For Families

Camp Kinda
(In English and Spanish) | Here’s a free, virtual summer camp experience designed to keep kids engaged, asking questions, and having fun even while they’re stuck at home. “Open” each weekday starting June 1 to September 1. On any given day, kids may be exploring the art of graphic novels, unlocking the mysteries of history, or jumping into the world’s craziest sports. Also available in Spanish.

How to Support Your Unique, Quirky Child
(In English and Spanish) | When your child behaves differently from others, it’s endearing—but is it OK? Read this Great Schools article to find ways to celebrate your child’s unique nature. A version in Spanish is also available: Cómo apoyar las características únicas de tu hijo.

Looking Forward and Planning Ahead

Video | The CDC Guidance on Reopening Schools, Explained
CDC recently released guidance on reopening schools. Its recommendations, which are voluntary, give parents and teachers their first detailed glimpse of how schools might change their operations to contain COVID-19. How much these recommendations will influence schools’ operations depends on the decisions of state and local leaders. Watch Education Week’s 4-minute video for an explanation of several key points.

SAVE the DATE | Webinar on Monday, June 8th @ 3 pm EDT
Safeguarding Back to School: Principles to Guide a Healthy Opening to Classrooms During COVID-19
The transition back to school this year will be unlike any in history. How do we safely reopen? In this edWebinar, leaders of the American Federation of Teachers (AFT) and Brooklyn Laboratory Charter Schools will discuss key questions we must all consider as we begin the journey back to school–from the school bus ride to the dismissal bell.
Register here. If you’d like to receive an email with a link to the recording afterwards, add your name to the list at: https://forms.gle/V6mgSp8n8fqxjv318

To top


Replacing the “Special” in Special Education

By Steven Benson, Ed.D.

Abstract

The use of language and words describing students with the advent of disabilities has changed over time with new medical, clinical, social advancement, and contextual circumstances.  Replacing “special” education with the current emphasis on individual educational minimizes a cookie-cutter entitlement for teaching strategies, supports services, and accommodations.  The Individualized Educational Plan (IEP) still remains as the cornerstone of a quality education for each student identified with a disability.  A more responsive learning environment is predicated on the diversification of educational experiences.  There is no abandonment of legal mandates for equity, accountability, or excellence in education for students with disabilities established by federal acts.  The philosophy follows that every student, regardless of his/her disabilities, has the right to be incorporated fully into the educational practices of the school, as well as being included into the fabric of society.

Replacing the Special in Special Education

“Education innovations are often due to the initiative of one person or a very few individuals.  As long as that individual or group keeps working on it, the innovation survives.  When they stop, it dies.” (Taylor et al., 1972)

Isn’t it time to replace the moniker “special” education to a more wide-ranging concept of individualized education?  Individualized education equates to customized teaching strategies, support services, and accommodations that are determined through the development of an Individualized Education Plan (IEP).  Therefore, calling services and accommodations “special needs” links to saying “handicapped” – an antiquated, inapplicable term that Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA, 2019) deems a disability.  Historically, handicapped indicated a condition that markedly restricted a student’s ability to function physically, mentally, or socially.  Pejorative and disparaging language can make students feel excluded and can be a barrier to full participation in the educational processes.  Fortunately, the use of language and words describing students with the advent of disabilities has changed over time with new medical, clinical, social advancement, and contextual circumstances. 

For example, idiot was formerly a legal and psychiatric category of profound intellectual disability.  The student’s mental age was two years or less, indicating the student could not guard against common dangers. Idiot, along with terms like moron, imbecile, and cretin is now archaic and offensive (World History, n.d.).  Idiot was replaced by profound mental retardation which was  replaced by intellectual disability (ID), characterized by significant limitations in reasoning, learning, and problem solving, as well as adaptive behavior, which involves a range of everyday social and practical skills.

Individualized education relies on the IEP as the cornerstone of a quality education for each student identified with a disability.  Program development becomes the essence of confirming a student with a disability to receive individualized instruction and related services that enhance educational, social, and emotional stability.  “Diversification of educational experiences for all students leads to a more responsive learning environment” (Benson, p. 31).  The end result of an IEP encourages the “conceptualization of the whole child with a map of interventions individually designed [for] better educational outcomes (Geller, n.d.). 

To accept unquestionably that special education cannot be changed to individualized education is a myth.  Although there are statues derived from court cases which use the term special education, changing the wording to individualized education is not insurmountable.  Even though laws and statues exist that coin special education, they may have become ideologically at odds with current convictions about teaching strategies, support services, and accommodations.  There is not a faceless structure of forces that can prevent change (Weir, 2007).  Change makes an essential adjustment in practice that covers a wide range of directions, accepting, however, immediate and/or revolutionary change may signal rejection.

Principled acts of courage and self-sacrifice categorize heroes and heroines from our cultural heritage.  Their actions humanized the conditions of our existence (Zais, p. 503).  History reveals that individuals who had the philosophical and ethical mindsets, as well as the tenacity and courage to take on previous constructs, prevail.  Heroes and heroines for social change are historically abundant.  Under the leadership of Susan B. Anthony, Elizabeth Cady Stanton, and other women’s rights pioneers, suffragists circulated petitions and lobbied Congress to pass a constitutional amendment to enfranchise women to vote.  The premise for enfranchisement of all American women lasted almost 100 years through speeches, signed petitions, marches, and parades.  Following a suffrage parade during President Woodrow Wilson’s inauguration, Wilson supported a constitutional amendment that gave women the right to vote, with passage of the 19th Amendment in 1920.

Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr. is the most well-known figure of the civil rights movement that used nonviolent civil disobedience to push for social change.  Following the post-Civil War Reconstruction Era, Jim Crow Laws laid the groundwork for segregation.  For the next two decades, countless black men and women mobilized, organizing boycotts, sit-ins, and nonviolent protests, resulting in jail time, beatings, and, in some cases, death (Witter, 2019).  The 1961 Freedom Rides and the 1963 March on Washington are prototypical examples of the efforts to counter against systematic oppression.  Efforts were not fruitless.  Congress passed the Civil Rights Act of 1964, ending segregation in public places and banning employment discrimination on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, or national origin. One year later, U.S. lawmakers also passed the Voting Rights Act of 1965, another ground-breaking piece of civil rights legislation.

 “The individual who consistently subordinates all other values to self-interested expedience in the decision making process is a person with whom it is patently unwise to entrust one’s welfare.” (Zais, p. 505).  The values inherent in one’s decisions do not reside with others.  One can judge, and be judged, exclusively on one’s decisions.  Who among us will call for eliminating “special” and replacing it with “individualized” education?  After all, it bears upon each of us who holds our students who need exceptional educational opportunities to engage in a courageous conversation about dignity, respect, and individualized educational opportunities to become contributing citizens of an inclusive society.

There is no suggestion for changing the identification of students with individual needs, the processes, nor the laws for granting individual services.  These have worked successfully for decades for fulfilling the educational obligations and rights for students with individual needs.  Changes in laws and educational practices have been modified throughout the years, based on scientific research and educational practices that provide adequate educational advancement for students with individual needs.  The Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975 (PL 94-142) required public schools to evaluate students with disabilities and to create an educational plan with parent input that would imitate as closely as possible the educational experience of non-disabled students.The Individuals with Disabilities Education Act, or IDEA, was created in 1990 and is a modification of the Education for All Handicapped Children Act.  The need for a free appropriate public education, appropriate evaluation, an individualized education plan, a least restrictive environment, parent participation, and procedural safeguards remain as the six principles of IDEA and should never be minimized. The Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act of 2004 (IDEA 2004) mandates equity, accountability, and excellence in education for students with disabilities.

The initial and final premise of this article is to change the word special to individual education.  The replacement of “special” does not invalidate the principle of inclusion, theeducational practice whereby students with individual needs are fully integrated into the general education classrooms.  Inclusion comprehends the philosophy that every student, regardless of his/her disabilities, has the right to be incorporated fully into the educational practices of the school, as wells as being included into the fabric of society.  It is the substance of assimilation, the absorption of a new idea into an existing cognitive structure, i.e., the mandates of IDEA upon whom one can rely.  Reiterating the foreword: “Education innovations are often due to the initiative of one person or a very few individuals.  As long as that individual or group keeps working on it, the innovation survives.  When they stop, it dies.” (Taylor et al., 1972).

Reference Page

Benson, B. S. (2019).  Increasing proficiency levels for support and services administrators. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation).  American College of Education.  Indianapolis,   Indiana.

Education for All Handicapped Children Act of 1975, 20 U.S.C. § 1401 et seq.  Retrieved from www.gpo.gov/fdys/pkg/STATUE-89-Pg773.pdf 

Geller, N. J.  (n.d.)  DSM-5 and IDEA:  From prescription pad to the classroom [PowerPointSlides]. Retrieved from www.amchp.org/…/projects/spharc/peer-to-peer-exchange/Documents/DSM-5_and_IDEA.pdf.www.amchp.org › spharc › peer-to-peer-exchange › Documents › DS…

Giddens, A.  (2007). In Class in America:  An Encyclopedia.  Volume 1: A-G.   Weir, R. E.  (Ed.)   (pp 1-376).  Westport, Connecticut:  Greenwood Press. History.com Editors.  (2020).  Women who fought for the vote.  A&E Television Networks. Retrieved fromhttps://www.history.com/topics/womens-history/women-who-fought-for-the-vote-1

Individuals with Disabilities Education Act of 1990.  20 U.S.C. § 1400 (1990).  Retrieved form https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/20/1400

Individuals with Disabilities Education Improvement Act, 20 U.S.C. § 1400 (2004).  Retrieved from https://sites.ed.gov/idea/

Taylor, E. F., Halfman, R. L., MacVicar, M. A., Martin, W. T., Zacharias, J. R.  (1972). Tactics for change.  1-11.  Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Retrieved from http://www.eftaylor.com/pub/TacticsForChange.pdf

“The clinical history” of ‘moron,’ ‘idiot,’ and ‘imbecile’. The words have less-than savory past. (n.d.).  Merriam-Webster.  Retrieved from https://www.merriam-webster.com/words-at play/moron-idiot-offensive-history        

Thousand, J. S., Udvari-Solner, A., & Villa, R. A.  (2016).  Differentiated instruction: Access to the general education curriculum for all.  In R. A. Villa and J.S. Thousand (Eds.). Leading an inclusive school: Access and success for all students.  117-143. Alexandria, VA: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.

Witter, B.  (2019).  Martin Luther King Jr and 8 Black Activists who led the Civil Rights Movement.  Retrieved fromhttps://www.biography.com/news/martin-luther-king-jr-black-activists-civil-rights-movement

Zais, R. S.  (1976). Curriculum Principles and Foundations.  Harper & Row, Publishers: New York, NY.

To top


Children with an Intellectual Disability in an Inclusive Setting

By Keishla Candelario

Many students with intellectual disabilities access their education in a self-contained setting. The only acquaintance they have in an inclusive environment is during electives and or specials. It is unlikely to see a child or children with an intellectual disability in an inclusive setting. The decision of the student’s placement is determined by the M-Team, which consists of; the parent, the special education teacher, general education teacher, school psychologist, district representatives and therapist (if needed). Although the child’s Least Restrictive Environment (LRE) is taken into consideration, it is often determined that a child with intellectual disabilities be placed in a self-contained classroom. However, other options should be considered because the label does not determine the setting. Many students with intellectual disabilities can benefit and show growth in different areas from being in an inclusive setting. It is important that if they are able to perform in an inclusive setting that they be given the opportunity. In this meta-analysis, I will discuss the benefits and challenges of children with an intellectual disability in an inclusion setting.

The Council for Exceptional Children defines an Intellectual Disability as a significantly sub-average general intellectual functioning, existing concurrently with deficits in adaptive behavior and manifested during the developmental period, that adversely affects a child’s educational performance. Students with intellectual disabilities show difficulties academically, socially and with adaptive behaviors. Being in an inclusion setting will allow students the opportunity to be exposed to experiences they might not have in a self-contained setting.

 

Mainstreaming in Early School Years

The first article was a case study to examine the quality of mainstreaming in preschool. This case study focused on five children with Down Syndrome and developmental delays. The research conducted was to obtain information on the mother’s views of the quality of mainstreaming practices in preschool institutions and recommendations for increasing the quality of preschool mainstreaming. When the children were ready for preschool, the parents visited more than one institution which resulted in their child not being accepted, and in turn caused the child to start late due to this challenge. The mothers felt that placing their children in an inclusive setting was a good decision and they felt that independence and individuality was supported. They also felt that mainstreaming was beneficial to their child’s socializing skills which transferred from school to different settings, such as sports and arts. Although they were content with the improvement in their child’s social skills, they felt that their child’s educational needs were not met. Parents expressed difficulties with finding teachers that were experienced with children with special needs. Mainstreaming in early school years allows children to be exposed to experiences that general education students are exposed to in efforts to improve their social skills. Finding teachers or school with good quality programs is a constant challenge that parents face, but the end result is worth it.

 

Success in the Inclusion Setting

There are many factors that contribute to the success of children with an intellectual disability in an inclusive setting. Sometimes teachers do not have the proper training, knowledge or resources to teach students to the best of their ability. Collaboration between general education teachers and special education teacher is crucial for student success. Having proper training and knowledge of evidence-based practices provides guidance for teachers on how to meet the needs of children with an intellectual disability. In the article, UDL and Intellectual Disability: What Do We Know and Where Do We Go? ( Rao, Smith and Lawrey, year), the researchers state that UDL is a framework that educators can use as the plan curriculum and instruction. This framework can be applied to the design of instructional goals, methods, materials, and assessments to build flexible paths of learning. This is exactly what children with an intellectual disability need. They need instruction, presentation, expectations, and evaluations to be tailored to their individual needs in order to master their goals.

Evidence based practices provide teachers with strategies that have been researched to be successful. In a study conducted of the use of response cards in the general education classroom for students with an intellectual disability (site article), research showed that it is an effective strategy that increases student engagement. Although this study mostly focused on student engagement, the use of response cards can also be a tool to collect data and examine academic growth. This study also mentioned how collaboration between the special education teacher and general education teacher was crucial. The special education teacher created the response cards based on student accommodations and Individualized Educational Plan. Special education teachers have more knowledge and understanding of the needs of students with special needs.

Collaboration can play a big role in student success, especially for students with an intellectual disability. General education teachers generally use strategies that are effective for a whole class. In turn, when working with students with special needs, this is not effective. They have individual needs, goals and their own way of learning. Professional development classes for teachers is another important factor in the implementation process reference these strategies. Both general and special education teachers need to be knowledgeable and understand evidence-based practices in order to ensure that students with an intellectual disability are meaningfully included and engaged in the learning process through a variety of strategies. 

 

Postsecondary Education for Children with an Intellectual Disability

Inclusion should not only exist in the K-12 setting, but also in postsecondary education. In a study that was conducted in the University of Tennessee, researchers Gibbons, Cihak, Mynatt , and Wilhoit wanted to know how faculty and other students would feel about the participation of young adults with an intellectual disability in a University setting. Faculty members and students expressed that it would be a good idea, but they were also skeptical about the impact it would have during instructional time. Faculty members that were not part of the education program felt that they did not have the proper training to work with students with special needs. They also expressed that they were concerned about what this meant for the rest of the student body and scared that students would fail. University students believed that these young adults with an intellectual disability should be part of clubs and assemblies but were also concerned of the impact during class. Not being knowledgeable of strategies and a specific disability could result in fear which could lead to disinterest. When we do not know much about something and are not really interested in it, we lack the motivation to learn about it. When we do not know much about something but are asked to be part of it because it is part of our job, the unknown can lead to anger and blaming others. It is hard to teach students with an intellectual disability when you have no knowledge of the effects of their disability and how to help them. Being knowledgeable and well trained should be mandatory for all teachers and professors to promote the inclusion of these students.  Attending college and universities can also have a big impact on social skills and life skills. This will allow them to interact with other people other than just their family. It can also give them a sense of responsibility and teach them how to manage time, stay organized, and complete tasks that can eventually lead to having a job and being more independent.

 

Conclusion

In conclusion, although there might be some challenges in placing children with intellectual disabilities in a inclusive setting it would be beneficial in for them and promote growth academically, socially, and with adaptive behaviors. Being placed in an inclusive setting will allow the students to be exposed to different social experiences that will teach them skills they can transfer outside of school. Teachers must use evidence-based practices to support and encourage students’ academic performance in an inclusion setting. General education teachers and special education teachers collaboration is essential to meet the student’s needs.  Inclusion in postsecondary education can prepare young adults with intellectual disabilities for the real world. It can teach them how to be responsible, organize and manage their times which are all qualities needed to have a job or live independently. Lack of teacher training and knowledge can lead to misconceptions and not effectively teaching children with intellectual disability. To overcome these challenges general education teachers and special education must attend professional developments and know how to find resources that will help them meet students learning needs. Schools needs to do a better job when placing children with intellectual disabilities. Their disability does not determine their setting. It is important to focus on the child’s strengths instead of worrying about their failure to maximize their potential. 

 

References

 

Clarke, L. S., Haydon, T., Bauer, A., & Epperly, A. C. (2016). Inclusion of Students With an Intellectual Disability in the General Education Classroom With the Use of Response Cards. Preventing School Failure, 60(1), 35–42.

Gibbons, M. M., Cihak, D. F., Mynatt, B., & Wilhoit, B. E. (2015). Faculty and student attitudes toward postsecondary education for students with intellectual disabilities and autism. Journal of Postsecondary Education and Disability, 28(2), 149-162.

Rao, K., Smith, S. J., & Lowrey, K. A. (2017). UDL and intellectual disability: What do we know and where do we go? Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 55(1), 37-47.

Cosier, M., White, J. M., & Wang, Q. (2018). Examining the variability in general education placements for students with intellectual disability. International Journal of Whole Schooling, 14(2), 16-52.

Kayhan, N., & Özaydin, L. (2018). The quality of mainstreaming in preschool: The views of parents of children with down syndrome. Journal of Education and Learning, 7(2), 157-173

To top



Visual Supports for Students with Disabilities: A Review of Literature

By Krystal Fernandez

Abstract

This literature review seeks to study and evaluate the beneficial effects of visual supports and students with disabilities. Students with disabilities encounter struggles in understanding, communication, and expression. These struggles put a strain on a student’s learning process, evidently a student’s education. Studies have shown implementing these visual supports rather than the use of written or auditorial methods, facilitates understanding and communicative expression.

More recent than not, there has been a number increase in special education students sitting in a modern-day classroom. Today, students with disabilities are learning in the same classroom with typical students and it is important to support students’ exceptional needs while inside the classroom. Students with disabilities may be diagnosed with Autism Spectrum Disorder (ASD), Dyslexia, Speech and Language delays, Intellectual Disabilities (IND) and/or Deaf or Hard of Hearing. Students with these exceptionalities can be affected in the way a student processes, understands and communicates, which makes it challenging inside the classroom for the student. Students with disabilities, as well as typical students, all learn differently from the student sitting next to them. Some students learn through audio, kinesthetics, reinforcement and finally, visually. The following literature review was conducted based on peer-reviewed studies and research on the topic of visual supports. Do visual supports benefit students with disabilities? The articles chosen correlate to the topic of visual supports and their benefit to students with disabilities.

This topic is important because students living with disabilities often experience challenges in keeping in normal classroom contexts and require special assistance to enable them to realize their academic potential. Among the most challenging disabilities is autism. According to the Center for Disease Prevention and Control (2016), one in very fifty-four children is diagnosed with autism spectrum disorder (ASD).  These statistics indicate that many students that attend public schools have a learning challenge. Visual aid is among the strategies that educators use to assist those with communication difficulties to improve their understanding and expression skills. Visual support is designed to aids learners that have a better response to visual input as compared to auditory input. In most cases, visual support works better for children with autism and includes visual tools that facilitate the learning of language. While the use of this strategy is improving the learning ability of students with autism, Hayes et al. (2010) argue that this approach is time-consuming and very challenging to implement. A review of literature provides insights on how this strategy of teaching facilitates understanding as compared to auditory learning and the challenges that are currently being experienced in visual learning contexts.

Visual support involves the use of visual aids such as pictures, photographs, videos, graphs, and keywords charts to facilitate the learning process among students with communication difficulties (cited in Seprotto, 2016).  According to Spriggs, Dijk, and Mims (2015), the use of visual activities is one of the most successful strategies that facilitate cognitive learning with students living with disabilities. This alternative teaching strategy was introduced as an intervention for aiding children with special needs who experience challenges in class when standard teaching and assessment approaches are used (Seprotto, 2016). The adoption of this teaching approach is backed by empirical evidence that illustrates the difference in the learning abilities of autistic students when visual approaches are employed and when auditory approaches are used. Bobek and Tversky (2016) argue that teaching is characterized by a myriad of challenges that require educators to devise means and strategies that will enhance students understanding. Additionally, these authors point out that cognitive psychology is about discovering cognitive principles that facilitate learning and teaching processes. To this end, educators and researchers have experimented with various approaches to enhancing understanding among children with disabilities and agreed that visuals play a different role in the learning process. One of the cases that demonstrates the effectiveness of visual aid in teaching intellectually challenged or those leaving with autism is the case cited in Seprotto (2016). In this case, a student with autism was given a similar task that was to be completed in written and verbal forms. While the student scored maximum points in the written assignment, she failed the entire assignment presented orally. In this sense, the visual teaching strategy was more effective for this student as compared to auditory strategy implying that students with special needs must be given special instructions to achieve their potential. 

The adoption of visual aid in the classroom is a scientific concept that is informed by the role that visuals play in people’s lives. According to Bobek and Tversky (2016), visual explanations are more effective as compared to verbal explanation irrespective of whether the learner is living with disabilities or not. This assertion is based on the observation that contrary to verbal explanations, visual explanations are more coherent, explicit, and complete (Bobek & Tversky, 2016). Given the advantages associated with visual explanation, research has found them more effective in facilitating learning among children with autism or communication challenges. As noted by Hayes et al. (2010), people with autism are offered supportive interventions immediately after diagnosis that occurs during their early stages of life. Among these interventions include the visual tools of different kinds that may include objects or drawings that enable them to understand their environment. These tools reduce the challenges of communication that are common among persons with autism (Hayes et al., 2010). The use of visual tools to facilitate communication in are extended to learning contexts where students possess varying capabilities. According to Khan et al. (2017), communication skills comprise listening, speaking, writing, and reading.  Additionally, this author argues that communication is very vital in the learning process in the sense that teachers who are incapable of communicating to the students cannot achieve positive outcomes. To this end, learning begins effective teacher-student communication. For this reason, Spriggs, Dijk, and Mims (2015); Hayes et al. (2010); and Seprotto (2016) agree that the use of visual tools in teaching students with autism contributes to positive learning outcomes. Thus, educators should focus on communication during the teaching-learning process.

According to Spriggs, Dijk, and Mims (2015), visual aid is useful for both autistic learners and their educators. These authors opine that students with difficulties in organizing their work, following routines, and memory challenges benefit greatly when this strategy is employed. In the same vein, Sperotto (2016) points out that visual prompts play an important role when learning new skills or developing further on existing knowledge. In classroom contexts, such prompts act as a reminder of previously learned content when it is revisited later. Additionally, Shabiralyani et al.  (2015) argue that visual aids also makes the learning process interesting and easy hence encouraging children with learning difficulties to be more active. For this reason, visual activity schedules have been used for several years to aid learning among children with disabilities (Spriggs, Dijk, & Mims, 2015). This teaching strategy is preferred because of the structured nature of the environment that supports scheduled activities. Further, these authors assert that juts the way visual aid is used in different contexts to achieve a specific objective, the same concept applies in educational settings to assist students with memory challenges to accomplish tasks as required. With the aid of visual schedules, students with autism have been able to complete tasks according to schedule, learn new skills that apply to day to day living such as using debit cards (Spriggs, Dijk, & Mims, 2015). These skills are critical determinants of students’ school outcomes as well as independence that is very important after completing school.

Although the use of visual tools has been an effective strategy for aiding learning among children with autism for decades, there have been challenges associated with their fragile nature that required parents and teachers to replace them more regularly (Hayes et al., 2010). Additionally, Hayes et al. (2010) content that the available material does not offer enough opportunities for learners to grow their communication beyond the available tools. These difficulties are as a result of the slow integration of technology in visual aid. For instance, augmentative communication devices have not been introduced to learning contexts because they are expensive and difficult to customize. Thus, such tools have not been given priority by educators and are often treated as secondary support devices that do not assist students with disabilities to make progress (Hayes et al., 2010). Therefore, future developments in visual aid should focus on how to assist learners to progress from one level to another. To achieve this, the visual aids must be faded and replaced with more advanced ones as the students make progress. The technology-aided tools must be customized and affordable by parents with average wages to facilitate consistency in skills acquisition during holiday. Hayes et al. (2010) suggest that supporting and scaffolding roles can be enhanced simultaneously if novel ubicomp technologies are developed. Flexibility and simplicity are another factor that must be considered when developing tangible digital support tools that will increase the level of interaction and communication among students with disabilities. These adjustments can greatly improve educational outcomes and levels of independence among students living with disabilities.

As the literature indicates, students living with disabilities require special attention since they are unable to cope with normal teaching and assessment approaches that are used in normal classrooms. Autism or other disabilities may sometime interfere with the ability to communicate verbally. With the aid of visual activities, students with challenges in oral communication find it easy to transition from one activity to the other and can easily learn life skills that are essential in their day to day lives. Therefore, the uses of visual tools visual learning facilitate student-teacher communication which is required for understanding of concepts. Although significant progress has been made in this sector, there is a need for further improvement to facilitate the integration of technology to visual support learning. Customized, affordable, and flexible digital visual support tools are needed to boost the communication potentials of students with disabilities. The current visuals support tools should also be designed to gradually improve students’ communication skills from one level to the other though fading of the initial simpler ones to the more complex ones as the student progresses.

References

Bobek, E., & Tversky, B. (2016). Creating visual explanations improves learning. Cognitive Research: Principles and Implications, 1(1), 27. Retrieved from doi.org/10.1186/s41235-016-0031-6.

 Center for Disease Control and Prevention. (2016). Autism spectrum disorder (ASD).  Retrieved from www.cdc.gov/ncbddd/autism/data.html

Hayes, G.R., Hirano, S., Marcu, G., Monibi, M., Nguyen, D., &Yeganyan, M. (2010). Interactive visual supports for children with autism. Pers Ubiquit Comput, 14,663-680. Retrieved from doi.org/10.1007/s00779-010-0294-8

 Khan, A., Khan, S., Zia-Ul-Islam, S., & Khan, M. (2017). Communication skills of a teacher and its role in the development of the students’ academic success. Journal of Education and Practice, 8(1), 18-21.

Shabiralyani, G., Hasa, K., Hamad, N., & Iqbal, N. (2015). Impact of visual aids in enhancing the learning process case research: District Dera Ghazi Khan. Journal of Education and Practice ,6(19), 226-233. Retrieved from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ1079541.pdf

Sperotto, L. (2016). The visual support for adults with moderate learning communication disabilities: How visual aids support learning. International Journal of Disability, Development, and Education, 63(2), 260-263.

Spriggs, D., Dijk, W., & Mims, J. (2015). How to implement visual activity schedules for students with disabilities. DADD Online Journal: Research to Practice, 2, 21-34. Retrieved from dc.etsu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi

To top


Masters of Morphology: Explicit Multisensory Structured Metacognitive Language Strategies to Foster Adolescent Learners’ Content Vocabulary

By Samantha Ashley Forrest

Bibliographic Information

Elke Schneider & Kavin Ming (2019) Masters of Morphology: Elicit Multisensory Structured Metacognitive Language Strategies to Foster Adolescent Learners’ Content Vocabulary, The Clearing House: A Journal of Educational Strategies, Issues and Ideas, 92:3, 101 – 111

A. Major Points

  • Multisensory Structured Language Instruction
  • Vocabulary: Prefix – Root – Suffix Instruction
  • Adolescent Learners: Middle and High School
  • Effective Strategy for Both Native and Non – Native Speakers

B. Result and Limitations of Study

The purpose of this study was to engage adolescent learners in middle and high school in acquiring a more meaningful approach to vocabulary in reading and writing tasks. A report from the National Association for Educational Progress in 2017 stated that 32% of fourth grader students and 24% of eighth grade students scored below the basic level in overall reading skills (Schneider, 2019). One factor believed for the low academic scores was due to academic vocabulary. Elke Schneider and Kavin Ming wanted to go beyond the traditional methods of teaching vocabulary through  “completing commonly used vocabulary worksheets, definition matching or flashcard activities where the goal is rote memorization (Schneider, 2019).” They initiated a plan using multisensory structured, metacognitive language (MSML) strategies to establish a better foundation to assist adolescent learners of mastery of prefix – root – suffix (PRS) in reading and writing across multiple content areas. In addition, the MSML strategies would benefit both native, non – native English Speakers, and students with language processing disabilities to become more confident in vocabulary.

The researchers selected teachers to provided PRS patterns that are age – culture – discipline – and unit relevant to what was already happening in the classroom. The teachers select PRS pattern words that were two grade level above their learners’ grade. When picking words, teachers choose patterns that were different in how they are written and pronounced to avoid confusion and promote logical chunking strategies with Greek and Latin roots. This would allow non – native English Speakers to provide their own input by translating the Latin root. For example, in English we say “moment” or “predict,” a non – native English Speaker would notice that “el momento” and “prevenir” are spelled with the same Latin root word in Spanish (Schneider, 2019).

The study was conducted in two phrases. First phrase was the introduction of the PRS word patterns. Teachers would introduce the lesson following a three to five minute with prereading activities. Then the teachers would explicitly teach the prefix/root/suffix that was the focus of the lesson and engage the students in an interactive lesson. Adolescent learners would have a metacognitive discussion with the teacher and learn gestures and images to help them retain the new prefix/root/suffix. For instance, the teacher would model the prefix “ex” meaning “out of or from,” by having students use kinesthetic and tactile movements like tracing the word with their fingers on the desk and slowly move to open and close the door for get out (Schneider, 2019). This would occur using with repeated movements that the learners would produce as the meaning, sentence, supportive image, and gesture for what the prefix “ex” mean on a flashcard. Second phrase was the initial practice with PRS patterns. The learners would practice their PRS pattern words using their own made flashcards. The teachers were encouraged to create familiar game formats such as Bingo, Charades, Pictionary, among other interactive games. The study provides three activities and strategies that were successful for the adolescent learners: Word Detective Blending Practice, PRS Domino Game, and Transfer of PRS Knowledge (Schneider, 2019).

The data collected has proven to effective considering that with use of MSML approach helped “bridge the achievement gap between underprivileged, lower performing students, and higher performing students over time and lead to efficient vocabulary enhancement (Schneider, 2019).” The only limitation was that the study did not state how long did their study occur. Was it 9 weeks or more than have a school semester? The data analyzed through teacher observations, performance demonstrations, and a rubric created by the researchers Schneider and Ming. There was no data referring to what the students knew prior to the MSML strategies implementation and after results to show quantitative data. The students however mentioned their own inputs. One student reported that “Learning this way was fund. We didn’t even know we were studying (Schneider, 2019).” Another student said, “It made passing the ACT so easy because I knew how to figure out words (Schneider, 2019).” Which any teacher would be happy to hear! The importance of engaged learners.

C. Personal Evaluation

The qualitative data provided an insight how the MSML strategies were effective with explicit and systematic instruction was beneficial regards of age of learners. The data was not over – generalized considering that rubric created by Schneider and Ming was a checklist of the ability of what the student was preforming (Schneider, 2019). Students would be given several opportunities in different situations to master the PRS pattern words. They were able to be engaged and motivated till the point that the PRS pattern words became automatic. Which is the purpose of MSML strategies, to have students become automatic with what their learning by using their senses.

The information based on the research conducted can be applied to any grade level using the PRS pattern words. Typically, third to fourth grade begin using these patterns using vocabulary strategies like context clues in their reading materials. Elementary would be the perfect place to initiate the PRS pattern words using MSML strategies because this would be setting the foundational skills to help the students as they progress into the upper grades. Earlier the better and progress would be easier to manage with interventions for struggling learners. However, the practice would be effective for any age of the learners. 

MSML strategies that were mentioned in this research was implemented into a group of fourth and fifth grade students. The fourth – grade group consisted of students with no diagnosed disabilities and the fifth – grade consisted of students with learning disabilities. The implementation was introduced in pieces based on the vocabulary and word patterns of the unit being taught. Students were engaged and motivated like the students in the study. Based off the teacher observation, the students were able to recall some of PRS pattern words used throughout the short time of the introduction. The MSML strategies were meaningful since the students were looking at the instruction as a way to encourage movement rather the tradition of practice, practice, practice to the point where they starting to tune out.

Works Cited

U.S. Department of Education. (2014, October 29). Building a Legacy: IDEA 2004. Retrieved from ED.gov: idea.ed.gov/explore/home

Wasatch School District . (2014, October 30). Video Surveillance Policy. Retrieved from Wasatch School District: www.wasatch.edu/cms/lib/UT01000315/Centricity/Domain/2/Article_III_Video_Surveillance_Policy.pdf

Adams, Donnie; Harris, Alma; Jones, Michelle Suzette. (2016). Teacher-Parent Collaboration for an Inclusive Classroom: Success for Every Child. Malayisan Online Journal of Educational Sciences, 4(3), 58 – 72.

Administrator Blog Series. (2016, July 15). Two Trains, Traveling in Opposite Directions…Word Problems and the Math Fluency Gap. Retrieved from IXL : blog.ixl.com/2016/01/15/two-trains-traveling-in-opposite-directions-word-problems-and-the-math-fluency-gap/

Alicia F. Saunders, K. S. (2013). Solving the Common Core Equation: Teaching Mathematics CCSS to Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 24-33.

An Overview of Related Services Under IDEA. (2013, 12 1). Retrieved from Education.com: www.education.com/print/Ref_Related_Services/

ASCD. (n.d.). The Common Core State Standards Initiative. Retrieved from ASCD.org: www.ascd.org/ASCD/pdf/siteASCD/policy/CommonCoreStds.pdf

Baker, A. (1997). Improving Parent Invovlement Programs and Practices: A qualitative Study of Parent Perception. School Community Journal, 7(1), 127-153.

Baker, A., & Soden, L. (1997). Parent Involvment in Children’s Education: A critical assessment of the Knowledge Base. Chicago: American Education Research.

Baker, L., Dreher, M. J., Shiplet, A. K., Beall, L. C., Voelker, A. N., Garrett, A. J., . . . Finger-Elam, M. (2011). Children’s comprehension of informational text: Reading, engaging, and learning. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 197-227.

Beecher, M., & Sweeny, S. M. (2008). Closing the Achievement gap with curriculum enrichment and differentiation: One school’s story. Journal of Advanced Academics, 502-530.

Behrent, M. (2011). In Defense of Public Education. Retrieved from New Politics: newopol.org/content/defense-public-education

Belva C. Collins, J. K. (2010). Teaching Core Content with Real-Life Applications to Secondary Students with Moderate and Severe Disabilities. TEACHING Exceptional Children, 52-59.

Blaska, J. K. (1996). Using children’s literature to learn about disabilities and illness. Moorehead, MN: Practical Press.

Blizard, J. (2012). The importance of effective communication. AORN Journal, 95(3), 319-320.

Bodrova, D. J. (2012, January). Play and Children’s Learning. Retrieved from National Association for the Education of Young Children : www.naeyc.org/files/yc/file/201201/Leong_Make_Believe_Play_Jan2012.pdf

Boyer, E. L. (1991). Ready to Learn: A Mandate for the Nation. San Francisco : Jossey-Bass.

Brown, H. K., Ouellette-Kuntz, H., Hunter, D., Kelley, E., Cobigo, V., & Lam, M. (2011). Beyond an Autism Diagnosis: Children’s Fucntional Independence and Parents’ Unmet Needs. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 1291-1302.

Brown, J. (2013, January 22). National dropout, graduation rates improve, study shows. Retrieved from USATODAY.com: www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2013/01/22/education-high-school-dropout-rate/1855233/

Bryant, M. S. (2017). Improving the Fraction Word Problem Solving of Students with Mathematics Learning Disabilities: Interactive Computer Application. Remedial and Special Education, 76-86.

Burke, M. M. (2013). Improving Parental Involvement: Training Special Education Advocates. Journal of Disability Policy Studies , 225-234.

Butrymowicz, S. (2010, September 1). National crisis: Not much training for some special-ed teachers. Retrieved from The Hechinger Report, Independent Educational News: hechingerreport.org/content/national-crisis-not-much-training-for-some-special-ed-teachers_4189/

Cancio, PhD1, E., Albrecht , S., & Jones , B. (2014). Combating the Attrition of Teachers of Students With. Intervention in School and Clinic 2014, Vol. 49(5), 306-312.

Carolan, J., & Guinn, A. (2007). Differentiation: lessons from master teachers. Educational Leadership, 64(5), 44-47. Retrieved 12 04, 2016, from www.ascd.org/premium-publications/books/110058e4/chapters/Differentiation@-Lessons-from-Master-Teachers.aspx

Caruana, V. (2015). Accessing the Common Core Standards for Students with Learning Disabilities: Strategies for Writing Standards-Based IEP Goals. Preventing School Failure, 237-243.

Chakrabarti, R. (2013). Vouchers, Public School Response, and The Role of Incentives: Evidence from Florida. Economic Inquiry , 500-526.

Chen, Wei-Bing; Gregory, Anne. (2011). Parental Involvement in the Prereferral Process: Implications for Schools. Remedial and Special Education, 447 – 457.

Collins, B. C., Karl, J., Riggs, L., Galloway, C. C., & Hager, K. D. (2010). Teaching Core Content with Real-Life Applications to secondary Students with Moderate to severe disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 43(1), 52-59.

Constable, S., Grossi, B., Moniz, A., & Ryan , L. (2013). Meeting the Common Core State Standards for Students with Autism the Challenge for Educators. Teaching Exceptional Children , 45(3), 6-13.

Darling-Hammond, L. (2010, Oct). What we can learn from Finland’s successful school reform. Retrieved from National Education Association: www.nea.org/home40991.htm

Darrow, A.-A. (2014). Applying Common Core Standards to Students with Disabilities in Music. General Music Today, 33-35.

Davis, J. (2013). Student Understandings of Numeracy Problems: Semantic Alignment and Analogical Reasoning. Queensland.

DeMik, S. A. (2008). Experiencing Attrition of Special. Valparaiso University.

Development, T. O. (2012, March 13). OECD calls for new approach to tackle teacher shortage. Retrieved from OECD: better policies for better lives: www.oecd.org/newsroom/oecdcallsfornewapproachtotackleteachershortage.htm

Devlin, S. H. (2011). Comparison of behavioral intervention and sensory-integration therapy in the treatment of challenging behavior. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 41, 1303-1320.

Donnie Adams, Alma Harris, Michelle Suzette Jones. (2016). Teacher – Parent Collaboration for an Inclusive Classroom: Success for Every Child. Malaysian Online Journal of Education Sceinces, 4(3).

D’Orio, W. (2013). Finland is #1!,Finland’s education success has the rest of the world looking north for answers. Retrieved from Administrator Magazine: Curriculum: www.scholastic.com/browse/article.jsp

Dr. Moira Konrad, D. S. (2014). Setting Clear Learning Targets to Guide Instruction for All Students. Intervention in School and Clinic, 76-85.

Dr. Sarah J. Watt, J. R. (2016). Teaching Algebra to Students with Learning Disabilities: Where Have We Come and Where Should We Go? . Journal of Learning Disabilities, 437-447.

Duncan, A., & Posny, A. (2010, Nov). Thirty-Five Years of Educating Children With Disabilities Through IDEA. Retrieved from ED.gov: www2.ed.gov.print/about/offices/list.osers/idea35/history/index.html

Dworkin, A. &. (2011). Pilot study of the effectiveness of weighted vests. American Journal of Occupational Therapists, 65(6), 688-694. doi:10.5014/ajot.2011.000596

Edutopia: Finland’s Formula for School Success (Edcation Everywhere Series). (2012, January 24). Retrieved from Edutopia.org: www.edutopia.org/reduction-everywhere-international-finland-video

English, J. (2013, Oct 24). US Teacher Gets Finnish Lesson in Optimizing Student Potential, Part 2. Retrieved from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) : oecdinsights.org/2013/09/24/us-teacher-gets-finnish-lesson-in-optimizing-student-poetential-part-2/

Epstein, J. (1995). School/family/community partnerships: Caring for the children we share. Phi Delta Kappan(72(5)), 701-712.

Essex, N. L. (2008). School Law adn he Public Schools: A Practical Guide for Educational Leaders. Boston: Pearson.

Fedewa, A. &. (2011). Stability balls and students with attention hyperactivity concerns: Implications for on-task and in-seat behavior. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 65(4), 393-399. doi:10.5014/ajot/2011.000554

Finland, T. T. (2008). Teacher Education in Finland. Helsinki: Forssan Kirjapaino.

Florida Department of Education. (2017). Retrieved from Florida Department of Education: www.fldoe.org/accountability/assessments/k-12-student-assessment/fsa.stml

Florida Standards Assessment. (2017). Welcome Page. Retrieved from Florida Standards Assessment: fsassessments.org

Folske-Starlin, H. (2017). Parental perceptions of effective educators for emotionally impaired students. Dissertation, Wayne State University.

Fox, C. S. (2014). The relationship between sensory processing difficulties and behavior in children aged 5-9 who are at risk of developing conduct disorder. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties, 19(1), 71-88. doi:10.1080/13632752.2013.854962

Friedman-Hill, S. W. (2010). What does distractibility in ADHD reveal about mechanisms for top-down attentional control? Cognition, 115(1), 93-103. doi:10.1016/j.cognition.2009.11.013

Friend, M., & Bursuck, W. D. (2010, July 20). The Special Education Referral, Assessment, Eligiblity, Planning, and Placement Process. Retrieved from Education.com: www.education.com/reference/article/special-education-referral-assessment/

Fullan, M. (2001). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Franciso, CA: Jossey-Bass, A Wiley Imprint.

Gale Encyclopedia of Education: special Education: Preparation of Teachers. (2013, 11 23). Retrieved from Answers.com: www.answers.com/topic/special-education-preparation-of-teachers

Garas-York, K. &. (2013). Comprehension. In High-Level Talk and Writing about Texts.

Giannetti, C. C. (1998). Turning parents from critics into allies. Educational Leardership(55(8)), 40-42.

Gimbert, B., Desai, S., & Kerka, S. (2010). The Big Picture: Focusing Urban Teacher Education on the Community. Kappan, 36-39.

Graham-Clay, S. (2005). Communicating with Parents: Strategies for Teachers. The School Community Journal, 117-130.

Gray, J. (2008, 12). The implementation of differentiated instruction for learning disabled students included in general education elementary classrooms. La Verne, California, United States.

Gray, Z. a. (2014). Power Up What Works: Understanding Word Problems in Mathematics. Retrieved from LD Online: www.ldonline.org/article/62401/

Hancock, L. (2011, September). Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved from Smithsonian.com: www.smithsonianmag.com/people-places/Why-Are-Finlands-Schools-Successful.html

Hargie, O. (2006). The Handbook of Communication Skills (3 ed.). (O. Hargie, Ed.) New York, NY: Routledge.

Hargie, O. (2017). Skilled Interpersonal Communication : Research, Theory and Practice (6th ed.). New York: Routledge.

Harris, L & Associates, Inc. (1987). Strengthening Links between Home and School. Retrieved December 1, 2013, from ERIC.gov: files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ed289841.pdf

Hayes, G., Gardere, L., Abowd, G., & Truong, K. (2008). CareLog: A Selective Archiving Tool for Behavior Management in Schools. CHIP 2008 Proceedings-Tools for Education, (pp. 685-694). Florence .

Heavey, S. (2013, Nov 6). U.S. Poverty rate remains high even counting government aid. Retrieved from Business & Financial News, Breaking US & International News/ Reuters.com: www.reuters.com/assets/print?aid=USBRE9A513820131106

Hemphill, L. &. (2008). The Importance of Early Vocabulary for Literacy Achievement in High-Poverty Schools. Journal of Education for Students Placed at Risk, 426 – 451.

Henderson, A. T., & Berla, N. (1994). A New Generation of Evidence: The Family is Critical to Student Achievement. Retrieved 12 1, 2013, from ERIC.ed.gov: files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED375968.pdf

Heng-Yu Ku, C. A.-L.-C. (2004). The Effects of Individually Personalized Computer-Based Instructional Program on Solving Mathematics Problems. Science Direct, 1195-1210.

Herrington, V. R. (2009). Are Parents Informed Consumers: Evidence From the Florida McKay Scholarship Program. Peabody Journal of Education, 26-56.

Hilyard, V. M. (2004, Fall). Teachers’ understanding and use of differentiated instruction in the classroom. Saint Louis, Missouri, United States.

Hinojosa, P. &. (2008). Reported experiences from occupational therapists interacting with teachers in inclusive early childhood classrooms. American Journal of Occupational Therapists, 62(3), 289-297. doi:10.5014/ajot.62.3.289

History: twenty Five Years of Progress in Educating Children With Disabilities through IDEA. (n.d.). Retrieved from U. S. Office of Special Education Programs: www.ed.gov/offices/osers/osep

Ho, T. W. (2017). Component Processes in Arithmetic Word-Problem Solving and Their Correlates. Journal of Educatinal Psychology, 520-531.

Honig, B. &. (2013). Teaching Reading Sourcebook. Oakland, California : Consortium on Reading Excellence in Reading.

Hougen, M. C. (2012). Fundamentals of Literacy Instruction and Assessment (Pre – K – 6). Baltimore: Paul H. Brookes Publishing Co.

Hradecky, L. (1994, September/October). Vice-Principals’ guide to effective communication. The Canadian School Executive, 9-13.

Huff Post. (2012, 01 27). Best Education in the World: Finland, South Korea Top Country Rankings, U.S. Rated Average. Huff Post.

IES. (2013, 04 11). Fast Facts. Retrieved from National Center for Educational Statistics: nces.ed.gov/fastfacts/display.asp?id=64

Irma Suovirta, R. H. (2013, November 15). Statistics Finland: Pre-primary and comprheensive school education 2013. Retrieved from Statistics Finland: www.stat.fi/til/pop_2013_2013-11-15_tie_001_en.html

Itkonen, T., & Jahnukainen, M. (2009, August 8). Disability or Learning Difficulty? constructing Special Eduaiton Students in Finland and the United States. Retrieved from All Academic Research: citation.allacademic.com/meta/p_mla_apa_research_citation/3/0/7/6/5/pages307659/p307659-1.php

J. McLeskey, N. T. (2004). The Supply of and Demand for Special Education Teachers: A Review of Research Regarding the Chronic Shortage of Special Education Teachers. The Journal of Special Education, 5-21.

K12 Reader. (2008, May 29). What is Reading Comprehension? Retrieved from K12 Reader: en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reading_comprehension

Kamenetz, A. (2014, October 30). UPDATED: New Details On Bill Gates’s $5 Billion Plan To Film, Measure Every Teacher. Retrieved from Creative Conversations: www.fastcompany.com/3007973/creative-conversations/updated-new-details-bill-gatess-5-billion-plan-film-measure-every-tea

Kelley, S. (2014, October 30). Interview with Shawn Kelley. (A. Ivie, Interviewer)

Key Provision on Transition: IDEA 1997 compared to H.R. 1350 (IDEA 2004). (n.d.). Retrieved from National Center on Secondary Education and Transition: www.ncset.org/premium-publications/related/ideatransition.pdf

Kieffer, M. J. (2013). Morphological awareness and reading difficulties in adolescent Spanish-speaking language minority learners and their classmates. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 44-53.

Kinlan, C. (2011, January 21). Rethinking Special Education in the U. S. Retrieved from Hechinger Report: hechingerreport..org/content/rethinging-special-education-in-the-u-s

Koen, M., & Ebrahim, H. B. (2013). Using real-worldness and cultural difference to enhance student learning in a Foundation Phase Life Skills module. South African Journal of Education, 13.

Koklu, A. D. (2011). Middle School Students’ Reading Comprehension of Mathematical Texts and Algebraic Equatiosn. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 447-468.

Konrad, M., Keesey, S., Ressa, V., Alexeeff, M., Chan, P., & Peters, M. (2014). Setting Clear Learning Targets to Guide Instruction for all students . Intervention in School and Clinic, 50(2), 76-85.

Krick-Morales, B. (2006). Reading and Understanding Written Math Problems. Retrieved from Reading Rockets: www.readingrockets.org/article/reading-and-understanding-written-math-problems

L. Fuchs, D. F. (2015). Is Word-Problem Solving a Form of Text Comprehension? Science Studies of Reading, 204-223.

L. Fuchs, R. S. (2016). Effects of Intervention to Improve At-Risk Fourth Graders’ Understanding, Calculations, and Word Problems with Fractions. The Elementary School Journal, 625-651.

Labor, D. o. (2013, 09 28). U.S. Department of Labor, Bureau of Labor Statistics. Web: stats.bls.gov. Retrieved from Info please: www.infoplease.com/ipa/A0104719

Laitsch, D. (2016). After 60 years, Do The Arguments For K-12 Vouchers Still Hold? Global Education Review , 23-32.

Last Name, F. M. (Year). Article Title. Journal Title, Pages From – To.

Last Name, F. M. (Year). Book Title. City Name: Publisher Name.

Lawrence-Lightfoot, S. (2004). Building bridges from school to home. Exceptional Children, 71(1), 97-108.

Lawson, M. (2003). School-Family Relations In Context: Parent and Teacher Perceptions of Parent involvement. Urban Education(38), 77-133.

Lepi, K. (2013). How 12 Countries Spend Education Money (And If It Makes A Difference). Edudemic; connecting education & technology.

Levy, H. M. (2008, Mar-Apr). Meeting the needs of all students through differentiated instruction: helping every child reach and exceed standards. The Clearing House, 81(4), 161-164. doi:10.3200/tchs.81.4.161-164

Literacy Leadership Brief: Reading Fluency Does Not Mean Reading Fast. (2018). International Literary Association.

Logan, B. (2008). Examining differentiated instruction: Teachers respond. Research in Higher Education Journal, 1-14.

M. Friend, W. D. (2013, 11 17). The Special Education Referral, Assessment, Eligibility, Planning, and Placement Process. Retrieved from Education.com: www.education.com/print/special-education-referral-assessment/

Major, A. E. (2012). Job Design for Special Edcuation Teachers. Current issues in Education Volume 15.

Martinez, A. M. (2011). Explicit and differentiated phonics instruction as a tool to improve literacy skills for children learning English as a foreign language. GIST Education and Learning Research Journal, 25-49.

Mayer, L. &. (1987). Cognitive Skills Used to Solve Mathematical Word Problems and Numerical Operations. Journal of Educational Psychology, 1345-1360.

Mesmer, H. A. (2005). Everybody’s selling it-But just what is explicit, systermatic phonics instruction? The Reader Teacher (Interational Reading Association), 366 – 376.

Miller, L. C. (2007). A randomized controlled pilot study of the effectiveness of occupational therapy for children with sensory modulation disorder. . American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 228-238. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.2.228

Miretzkey, D. (2004). The Communication Requirments of Democratic Schools: Parent-Teacher Perspectives on their Relationships. Academia, 814-851.

Moats, L. C. (n.d.). Teaching Adolsecents to Read: It’s Not Too Late. Voyager Sopris.

Montero, M. K. (2016). English Learners and Fluency Development: More Than Speed and Accuracy. Literacy Development with English Learners.

Morewood , A., & Condo, A. (2012). A Preservice Special Education Teacher’s. American Council in Rural Special Educatian.

Moustafa, Amr; Ghani, Mohd Zuri. (2016). The Effectiveness of a Multi Sensory Approach in Improving Letter-Sound Correspondence among Mild Intellectual Disabled Students in State of Kuwait. Journal of Education and Practice, 7, 151 – 156.

Muffler, A. (2014, October 2014). Interview with Andrew Muffler. (A. Ivie, Interviewer)

National Commission on Excellence in Education. (1993). A Nation At Risk: The Imperative For Educational Reform. Retrieved December 1, 2013, from Ed.Gov: www2.ed.gov/pubs/NatAtRisk/index.html

National Council on Disabilities. (2004, March 17). Improving Educational Outcomes for Students: Publication and Policy Briefs. Washington, D.C.: National Council on Disability. Retrieved from National Council on Disability: www.ncd.gov/premium-publications/2004/Mar172004

NICHCY. (2012, 03). Categories of Disability Under IDEA. Retrieved from National Dissemination Center for Children with Disabilities: nichcy.org/wp-content/uploads/docs/gr3.pdf

Oglan, G. &. (2001). Parent to parent: Our children, their literacy. Urbana: National Council of Teachers of English.

Oglan, G. R. (1997). Parents, learning and whole language classroom. Urbana, IL.: National Council of Teachers of English.

Oglan, G. R. (1997). Parents, learning and whole language classrooms. Urbana, IL.: National Council of Teachers of English.

Okagaki, A. B. (1994). Roles of Symbolic Knowledge and Problem-Information Context in Solving Word Problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 212-220.

Oscar Jimenez-Castellanos, W. J. (2018). The State of Education Savings Account Programs in The United States . National Education Policy Center , 1-23.

Ou, S.-R., & Reynolds, A. J. (2008). Predictors of Educational Attainment in the Chicago Longitudinal Study. School Psychology Quarterly, pp. 199-229. Retrieved September 9, 2013, from www.socialimpactexchange.org/files/Research%20Supporting%20NFTE%20TOC%201_0.pdf

Ozdamli, F. (2017). Attitudes and Opinions of Special Education Candidate Teachers Regarding Digital Technology. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues, 191 – 200.

P. Bjorn, K. A. (2016). Primary School Text Comprehension Predicts Mathematical Word Problem-Solving Skills in Secondary School. Educational Psychology, 362-377.

P. Vilenius-Tuohimaa, K. A. (2008). The Assosciation Between Mathematical World Problems and Reading Comprehension. Educational Psychology, 409-426.

Pardini, P. (2013, 11). The History of Special Education. Retrieved from rethinging schools. org: www.rethirngingschools.org/restrict.asp?path=archive/16_03/Hist163.shtml

Parent Brief Promoting Effective Parent Involvement in Secondary Educaiton. (2002, July). Retrieved from National Center on Secondary Education and Transition: ncset.org/premium-publications/printresource.asp?=423

Parsons, S. (2012). Adaptive teaching in literacy instruction: case studies of two teachers. Journal of Literacy Research, 44, 149-170.

Patrick, D. (2014, October 30). SB 1380 House Committee Report Version. Retrieved from Texas Legislature Online: www.capitol.state.tx.us/Search/DocViewer.aspx

Peterson, R. (1992). Life in a Crowded Place. Porstmouth, NH: Heinemann.

Phipps v Clark County School District, 2:13-cv-00002 (United States District Court for the District of Nevada January 25, 2013).

Plock v Board of Education of Freeport School District , 07 c 50060 (United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Western Division December 18, 2007).

Prater, M. A., Dyches, T. T., & Johnstun, M. (2006). Teaching students about learning disabilities through children’s literature. Intervention in School and Clinic, 42(1), 14-24.

R. Kanive, P. N. (2014). Comparison of the Effects of Computer-Based Practice and Conceptual Understanding Intervention on Mathematics Fact Retention and Generalization. The Journal of Educational Research, 83-89.

Rambin, J. (2014, October 30). Bill Requiring Surveillance In Special Education Classes Heads to House. Retrieved from Austinist: austinist.com/2013/04/08/bill_requiring_surveillance_in_spec.php

Rehabilitation, V. (2013). Vocational Rehabilitation Services for High School Students with Disabilities. Retrieved from Executive Office of Health and Human Services: www.mass.gov/eohhs/consumer/family-services/youth-services/youth-with-disabilities/vocational-services.html

Reis, S. M., McCoach, D. B., Little, C. A., Muller, L. M., & Kaniskan, R. B. (2011). The effects of Differentiated Instruction. American Educational Research Journal, 462-501.

Rossetti, Zachary; Keenan, Jennifer. (2018). The Nature of Friendship Between Students With and Without Severe Disabilities. Remedial and Special Education, 195 – 210.

Rubin, C. M. (2013, Jan 14). The Global Search for Education: What Will Finland Do Next? Retrieved from Huff Post Education: www.huffingtonpost.com/c-m-rubin/finland-education_b_2468823.html

Sahlberg, P. (2012). A Model Lesson; Finland Shows Us What Equal Opportunity Looks Like. American Educator, 20-40.

Salem, L. C. (2006). Children’s literature studies: Cases and discussions. Westport, CT: Libraries Unlimited.

Saunders, A. F., Spooner, F., Browder, D., Wakeman, S., & Lee, A. (2013). Teaching Common Core in English Language Arts to Students with Severe Disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Students , 46(2), 22-33.

Saundres, A. F., Bethune, K. S., Spooner, F., & Browder, D. (2013). Solving the Common Core Equation Teaching Mathematics CCSS to students with moderate and severe disabilities. Teaching Exceptional Children, 45(3), 24-33.

Schneider, E. &. (2019). Masters of Morphology: Explicit Multisensory Structured Metacognitive Language Strategies to Foster Adolescent Learners’ Content Vocabulary. The Clearing House: A Journal Of Education Strategies, Issues and Idea, 101 – 111.

Schussler, D. L. (2003). Schools as learning communities: Unpacking the concept. Journal of School Leardership(13), 495-528.

Servillo, K. L. (2009). You get to choose! Motivating students to read through differentiated instruction. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 2-11.

Short, K., Evans, A., & Hildebrand, K. (2011, August/September). Celebrating International Books in Today’s Classroom: The Notable Books for a Global Society Award. Reading Today, pp. 34-36.

Springer, B. (2014, October 31). Inteview with Ben Springer. (A. Ivie, Interviewer)

Stanford, B., & Reeves, S. (2009). Making it happen: Using differentiated instruction, retrofit framework. and Universal Design for Learning. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 1-9.

Stanford, P., Crowe, M. W., & Flice, H. (2010). Differentiating with technology. Teaching Exceptional Children Plus, 2-9.

Starr, E. M., & Foy, J. B. (2012). In Parent’s Voices: The Education of Children with Autism Spectrum Disorders. Remedial and Special Education, 207-216.

Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 935-947.

Subban, P. (2006). Differentiated Instruction: A research basis. International Education Journal, 7(7), 935-947. Retrieved 12 02, 2016, from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ854351.pdf

Sullivan, K. (2011, October 27). Book Award Celebrates Awareness for Disabilities. Inside Eau Claire.

Susan C. Bon, J. R. (2016). Special Education Voucher Programs, Reflective Judgment, and Future Legislative Recommendations. Peabody Journal of Education, 503-521.

Suzanne E. Eckes, J. F. (2016). Introduction: Legal and Policy Issues of Vouchers: Multiple Perspectives on Private School Choice . Peabody Journal of Education , 421-423.

Swinton, M. & Bassett, R. (1981). Teachers’ Perceptinos of Competencies Needed for Effective Speech Communication and Drama INstruction. Communication Education, 146-155.

Temple. (2018). Reading Comprehension. In Part II: Understanding and Learning with Informational Texts.

The Council of Chief State School Officers. (2014, October 30). Educational Leadership Policy Standards. Retrieved from ISSLC 2008: www.vide.vi/data/userfiles/Educational_Leadership_Policy_Standards_2008%20(1)(1).pdf

Thomas E. Scruggs, F. J. (2013). Common Core Science Standards: Implications for Students with Learning Disabilities. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 49-57.

Thompson, C. (2011). Multi-Sensory Intervention Observational Research. International Journal of Special Education, 26(1), 202-214. Retrieved November 5, 2016, from eric.ed.gov

Tomchek, S. D. (2007, March/April). Sensory Processing in Children With and Without Autism: A Comparative Study Using the Short Sensory Profile. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 61(2), 190-200. doi:10.5014/ajot.61.2.190

Tomlinson, C. (2009, July 24). What is differentiated instruction? Retrieved from Reading Rockets: www.readingrockets.org/article/what-differentiated-instruction

Tomlinson, C. A. (1999). Mapping a route toward differentiated instruction. Educational Leadership, 57(1), 12-16. Retrieved 12 03, 2016, from blog.elanco.org/gsgsteacherresources/files/2015/01/Mapping-a-Route-Towards-Differentiated-Instruction-1synvr0.pdf

Tough, P. (2016). Helping Children Succeed. New York, NY: Houghton Mifflin Harcourt Publishing Company.

University of Michigan: SPECIAL NEEDS EDUCATION . (2013). Retrieved from Unversity of Michigan; Department of Psychology: sitemaker.umich.edu/delicata.356/funding_for_special_needs_education

Utah State Office of Education. (2014, October 31). LRBI Guidelines. Retrieved from Utah State Office of Education: www.schools.utah.gov/sars/DOCS/resources/lrbi07-09.aspx

Valle, J. W. (2011). Down the Rabbit Hole: A Commentary About Research on Parents and Special Education. Learning Disability Quaterly, 183-190.

Van Kleeck, A. (2015). A Critical Preschool Oral Language Foundations for Later Reading Comprhension. The Academic Talk Register.

Vasinda, S. &. (2011). Extending Readers Theatre: A Powerful and Purposeful Match with Podcasting. The Reading Teacher, 486 – 497.

Vaughn, S., & Linan-Thompson, S. (2003, Fall). What is special about special education for students with learning disabilities? The Journal of Special Education, 37(3), 140-147. Retrieved 12 02, 2016, from files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/EJ785943.pdf

Villeneuve, M. &. (2012). Enabling Outcomes for Students with Developmental Disabilities through Collaborative Consultation. The Qualitative Report, 17, 1-29. Retrieved November 5, 2016, from www.nova.edu/ssss/QR/QR17/villeneuve.pdf

Waller, W. (1932). The Sociology of Teaching. New York: Wiley and Sons.

Wasburn, M., Wasburn-Moses, L., & Davis , D. R. (2012). Mentoring Special Educators:. Hammill Institute on Disabilities, 59-66.

Washburn-Moses, L. (2005, January). How to Keep Your Special Education Teachers. Retrieved from Managing Your School: www.nassp.org/portals/0/content/49169.pdf

William, T., & Sanchez.B. (2012). Parental Invovlement (and Ininvolvment) at an Inner-City High School. Urban Education, 47(3), 625-652.

Winzer, M. A. (2006). Confronting difference: an exursion through the history of special education. In M. a. Winzer, The SAGE Handbook of Special Educaiton. SAGE Publications.

Yaratan, R. E. (2014). IImpacct of Use of Technnology in Mathematics Lessonns on Student Achievement and Attitudes. Social Behavior and Personality, S31-S42.

To top


An Analysis of the Interactions between Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder, Oppositional Defiance Disorder, and Conduct Disorder, and Implications with Juvenile Delinquency

By Justin M. Tarradell

Abstract

This review analyzes characteristics of ADHD and environmental factors/stressors and evaluates whether these characteristics are predictors for future juvenile trouble. This review will also analyze the relationship between ADHD and Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD) and Conduct Disorder (CD) and draw conclusions/predictor variables to future juvenile issues. The results of the research generally agree upon the fact that adolescents with ADHD generally have issues with executive functioning skills that may/could last into adulthood, including but not limited to poor planning, poor impulse control, and emotional dysregulation. The results of the research also agree upon ODD being an important steppingstone in differentiating ADHD without comorbidity and ADHD with CD. The results of the research generally agree that any combination of the three disabilities covered in this review (ADHD, ODD, and CD) may lead to an increased risk of juvenile issues and misbehavior. This review is not aimed at generalizing the entire ADHD population automatically becoming delinquents. On the contrary, this review exists to establish relationships between ADHD, ODD, CD and several environmental factors that may lead to juvenile delinquency.

Introduction

Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD) is a neurological condition that is characterized by having symptoms of hyperactivity, impulsivity, and inattentiveness. ADHD is typically categorized into three types: predominantly hyperactive/impulsive type (ADHD-HI), predominantly inattentive type (ADHD-I), and combined type (ADHD-C). ADHD is one of the more common disorders in child psychiatry, ranging from about 3 to 9 percent of children being diagnosed with ADHD (Biederman et al. 1993; Wender 1995; Spencer et al. 2002) Children with ADHD-HI type often display symptoms of motor hyperactivity, fidgety or repetitive behaviors/actions, inability to remain seated for an extended period of time, inability to focus on one task for an extended period of time, poor impulse control, increased risk of impulsive decisions, and much more. ADHD-I type often display symptoms of being easily distracted, bouncing among tasks/activities frequently, poor concentration, poor organizational skills, clumsy behaviors, and much more. ADHD-C type sport a mix of all of these symptoms.

Oppositional Defiance Disorder (ODD) is a neurobiological condition that is characterized by anger issues, argumentative behaviors, and vindictive character traits. Symptoms of ODD can include easily losing one’s temper, easily annoyed by others, often angry and resentful towards others, argues with adults or people of authority, deliberately annoys others, spiteful behavior, and much more. Symptoms vary significantly in severity, mainly defined by setting(s) that the behavior takes place in. Mild symptoms may only occur in one setting, like home or school, whereas severe symptoms may occur in multiple settings. Some risk factors for the development of ODD include the child’s temperament, emotion regulation capacity, parenting or family issues. ODD, alongside ADHD, is among the more common childhood disorders, affecting about 10% of children (Bloom, Jones, Freeman, 2013)

Conduct Disorder (CD) is a vast disorder that consists of patterns of destructive, dangerous, aggressive, and deceitful behaviors. Because this disorder houses such a wide variety of behavior, no two cases will be the same. However, symptoms may generally include physical/verbal aggression directed towards humans or animals, heightened sexual activity/misconduct, theft, destruction of property, vandalism, truancy, and much more. ODD is a common precursor to CD but does not need to be present for a diagnosis of CD. Like ODD, common risk factors are environmental (parental abuse, neglect) and biological (differences/disturbances in brain structure). CD is often comorbid with other neurological conditions such as ODD and ADHD.

Comorbidity between ADHD and ODD is rather high, with about one-third to one-half of children with one disorder will also qualify for the other (Nock et al., 2007; Waschbusch, 2002). Children with a combination of two or more of these conditions often experience more severe symptoms. For example, lower impulse control is a common symptom of ADHD which may lead to higher rates of impulsive behavior, like robbery or theft (a common behavior observed in CD). More of these interactions and implications for these interactions will be explored throughout this review.

Environmental Factors / Stressors

Findings show that ADHD persists because of both genetic and environmental factors (Biederman & Faraone, 2005) and that the condition has a heritability rate at about 76% according to the same study. According to another study, “The ADHD, ODD, and CD are polygenic and some genes may have pleiotropic influences in different traits of these disorders. (Azeredo, Moreira, Barbosa, 2017 p. 2). That is, ADHD, ODD, and CD all share a common gene that influences the individuals’ response to environmental stressors. Environmental stressors play huge roles to the different observable and non-observable symptoms and behaviors of these three conditions.

ADHD observed behaviors typically include fidgety or repetitive movements, twitches, and the inability to remain seated or in one spot for an extended period of time. Non-observed behaviors typically include their inability to focus on one activity, phasing out or zoning out of the task, and absent-minded thinking. These behaviors are inherent but may be exaggerated or exasperated by outside factors and stressors. Some examples of stressors include unwanted tasks or responsibilities (a homework assignment), boredom (a student sitting through a lecture), and unwanted social situations (being forced to socialize with people the child may not like).

ODD and CD observed behaviors are typically more severe. Behaviors for ADHD are typically self-stimulated and doesn’t include another person, object, or animal, which could be the  opposite for ODD and CD. Observed behaviors for ODD include argumentative behavior towards adults or people of authority, spiteful behavior, negative remarks, and rude behavior. Observed behaviors for CD are vastly more severe and can range anywhere from petty theft to first degree murder. Stressors for ODD typically stem from being told what to do from people in charge, being reprimanded by an adult or person of authority, and/or yelling/aversive situations from the adult to the child. Many children with ODD may have an authority complex and have difficulties when others, “challenge,” their own authority, making them lose sense of logic and reasoning and instead placing their mind and instincts into fight mode. Stressors for CD can range vastly but include peer pressure (such as gang-related activities), insecurity (e.g. being, “manly,” to cover a teenage boy’s insecurities), authority complexes, family neglect or abuse, and substance abuse (both in the family and amongst the individuals themselves). It is important to note that some of the stressors for CD, such as substance abuse, can work as both a stressor and as an observed behavior. That is, a teenager with CD may abuse substances because they grew up in a household in which other members of the house abused substances. That same substance abuse from the teenager could then cause more severe behaviors because of their lack of judgement/psychoactive effects from said substances. It can result in a vicious loop where the causes and effects are blurred to the point where the child with CD may not know what came first.

The covariation among ADHD, ODD, and CD is mostly attributed to genetic influences (Dick et al., 2005; Martin, Levy, Pieka, and Hay, 2006) and to a lesser extent, non-shared environmental factors with no significant correlation with shared environmental factors. The behaviors observed in ADHD lead to a greater predisposition to ODD and CD, as these behaviors are typically disruptive and/or antisocial in nature (Azeredo, Moreira, Barbosa, 2017). These conditions play into each other and can increase the severity and frequency of observable behaviors exponentially in some cases.

Implications on Juvenile Delinquency

As discussed, ADHD, ODD, and CD can play a huge part into likelihood that children affected enter juvenile delinquent centers or detention centers. That’s not to say that having one of these three conditions makes it likely for those children to enter trouble. However, it is certainly an observable possibility that makes sense, considering the way that these three conditions interact with each other.

There was a study conducted by Sibley et. al in 2010 that analyzed age of initiation, severity, and variety of delinquent acts among four groups: a control group, a group who had ADHD, a group who had ADHD + ODD, and a group who had ADHD + CD. The participants were 288 male juveniles aged 5.0 – 12.83 years old. These groups were subdivided into severities: mild, moderate, and severe. Age of initiation for the mild severity subgroup include: 11.42 for ADHD only, 10.96 for ADHD + ODD, 10.36 for ADHD + CD, and 12.46 for the control group. The combination of ADHD and ODD or CD generally reduced the year of initiation by about one full year as compared to the ADHD only group and by about two years as compared to the control group. For moderate delinquency, the average age of initiation includes: 13.36 for ADHD only, 13.43 for ADHD + ODD, 11.99 for ADHD + CD, and 14.50 for the control group. The ADHD + CDD subgroup initiated delinquency much earlier than the control group at about a two-and-a-half-year difference. For severe delinquency, the average of initiation includes: 13.99 for ADHD only, 14.59 for ADHD + ODD, 12.87 for ADHD + CD, and 13.76 for the control group. Among the severe group, only the ADHD + CD subgroup initiated delinquency at a significantly earlier age than the control group at about a full year earlier.

For the severity variable, participants were given a severity score that was predetermined by several metrics and predefined barometers. For the mild severity, all four subgroups showed a similar prevalence of mild offending with no significant variations. For moderate delinquency, only the ADHD + CD subgroup varied significantly from the comparison participants. For severe delinquency, the ADHD + ODD and ADHD + CD subgroups displayed behavior that was significantly more severe as compared to the rest of the participants in the comparison groups. ADHD-only subgroups across the different severities did not engage in behavior that was significantly different than their own respective groups

For the variety variable, number of different delinquent acts were counted and compared among the subgroups and the average mean values are as follows: 6.19 different acts for the ADHD only subgroup, 6.72 for the ADHD + ODD subgroup, 8.69 for the ADHD + CD subgroup, and 5.37 for the control group. Across the board, all ADHD groups committed more different delinquent acts as compared with the control group. The ADHD + CD subgroup, however, was significantly higher than the other ADHD groups as well as the control group, with over three more different acts as compared with the control group and about 2 more than the other ADHD groups.

This specific study shows us that, in general, across all severities and subgroups, the ADHD + CD group committed more delinquent acts, committed those acts at an earlier age, and committed more severe acts as compared to the other groups. This study demonstrates, above all else, that the combination of any of the three disabilities in this review (ADHD, ODD, and CD) could lead to an increased risk of juvenile trouble and misbehavior as compared to neurotypical peers if not properly identified and addressed at an early age.

Evaluation and Conclusion

Upon reading the various research articles presented, my suspicions were proven correct that the combination of ADHD and either ODD or CD would present a higher likelihood in getting into juvenile trouble. The interactions between ADHD and the other disabilities is an unfortunate loop where each disability affects the other. The most prevalent example of this would be the decreased impulsive control as a result of ADHD leading to more impulsive behaviors that are observed in ODD and CD. Environmental stressors also go hand in hand with both increased frequency of observable behaviors as well as severity of those behaviors. The research articles I chose did an effective job at comparing disabilities and establishing connections between juvenile likelihood and ADHD, ODD and CD.

My perspectives for potential solutions to these issues mainly lie in increased awareness for ADHD, ODD, CD and its implications on behavior. As previously mentioned, research shows that these conditions can be observed as early as preschool. These behaviors need to be addressed as they are happening, not when the children affected are already in juvenile detention. As society advances, general awareness for mental health and disabilities has increased, but it is nowhere where it needs to be yet.

My perspectives for researchers of these articles and other articles mainly lie with gaining an increased knowledge base with the correlation of specific environmental stressors with specific, observable behaviors. There may be existence of this type of research, however this review was only based on the interactions amongst the three disabilities and its implications with juvenile trouble and was intended to serve as foundational knowledge to be explored deeper. I would like to know more information perhaps on the specific types of ADHD and its relations with ODD and CD. For example, I’d like to know if ADHD-HI has an increased number of observable behaviors and severity of behaviors if combined with ODD or CD.  I’d like to know which specific environmental stressors impact specific ADHD types more or less severely. I’d assume children that come from a household of negligence would seek more companionship, which may end up leading them to latch onto the wrong people and increasing the likelihood that they get peer pressured into committing juvenile crimes. I suppose what I am looking for is more of a micro-view of specific relationships between specific environmental stressors and specific disabilities.

References

Azeredo, A., Moreira, D., & Barbosa, F. (2018). ADHD, CD, and ODD: Systematic review of genetic and environmental risk factors. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 82, 10–19. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2017.12.010

Harvey, E. A., Breaux, R. P., & Lugo-Candelas, C. I. (2016). Early development of comorbidity between symptoms of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and oppositional defiant disorder (ODD). Journal of Abnormal Psychology, 125(2), 154–167. doi: 10.1037/abn0000090

Reale, L., Bartoli, B., Cartabia, M., Zanetti, M., Costantino, M. A., Canevini, M. P., … Bonati, M. (2017). Comorbidity prevalence and treatment outcome in children and adolescents with ADHD. European Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, 26(12), 1443–1457. doi: 10.1007/s00787-017-1005-z

Retz, W., Retz-Junginger, P., Hengesch, G., Schneider, M., Thome, J., Pajonk, F.-G., … RSler, M. (2004). Psychometric and psychopathological characterization of young male prison inmates with and without attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neurosciences, 254(4). doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0470-9

Rösler, M., Retz, W., Retz-Junginger, P., Hengesch, G., Schneider, M., Supprian, T., … Thome, J. (2004). Prevalence of attention deficit–/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) and comorbid disorders in young male prison inmates*. European Archives of Psychiatry and Clinical Neuroscience, 254(6), 365–371. doi: 10.1007/s00406-004-0516-z

Sibley, M. H., Pelham, W. E., Molina, B. S. G., Gnagy, E. M., Waschbusch, D. A., Biswas, A., … Karch, K. M. (2010). The Delinquency Outcomes of Boys with ADHD with and Without Comorbidity. Journal of Abnormal Child Psychology, 39(1), 21–32. doi: 10.1007/s10802-010-9443-9

Taskiran, S., Mutluer, T., Tufan, A. E., & Semerci, B. (2017). Understanding the associations between psychosocial factors and severity of crime in juvenile delinquency: a cross-sectional study. Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment, Volume 13, 1359–1366. doi: 10.2147/ndt.s129517

To top


Book Review: Hacking Leadership: 10 Ways Great Leaders Inspire Learning That Teachers, Students, and Parents Love

By Bridget Barahona

Abstract

To be a leader is to be the example, one cannot do it all. What does it take for a leader to get his team to be plugged in to the vision? The book Hacking Leadership by Joe Sanfelippo and Tony Sinanis covers ten ways a great leader inspires learning. Joe Sanfelippo and Tony Sinanis speak on the importance of a leader being supportive and knowing that being a leader is not always being the front runner but the central plug which fosters new ideas and grit. 

Hacking Leadership Book Review

Solutions… Many Leaders are followed because they are viewed as the solution to many problems. This book is the fifth book in a Hacking Leadership series which involves many different authors. This particular book covers ten problems wrestling in the education community. The purpose of this book is driven by what worked for other leaders and specific examples of how they handled solving common problems in education. The central topic covered in this book is how leadership is not always being the front runner but the central plug.

Both authors are in different levels of educational leadership and bring insight to the ten solutions presented in the book. The book fosters collaboration for success by pushing leaders to understand that leading takes more than being an administrator. Leading is defined throughout the book as being a model to transformative practices that bring forth innovation and new principles are worked on through collaborated efforts.

In addition, the book has an “out of the office” prospective and stands with leaders needing to be out and about, and not focused on policies, mandates, and test scores. Leaders are to be focused on authentic and personalized interactions to create strong relationships within the kingdom of education. Aside from relationship the book speaks on different ways to lead from the heart and covers the importance of healthy relationship.

Furthermore, the book wants the hacking mentally to be the key to culture change. The book described the hacking mentality as tinkerers and fixers (pg. 10). Having this mentality is viewed as seeing solutions to problems in perspectives that others are not able to view. According to the Hacker’s books series and this specific serie, all problems can have a solution but it takes a selfless leader with a heart, meaningful relationships, and interactions to bring forth solutions in the education system.

Main Themes and Key Quotes

This book has ten main topics which are broken down with supportive solutions by both author’s experiences in education as students, parents, and now leaders. It is repeatedly expressed how two main themes will bring fourth solutions. One is having a strong relationship with staff and the school community, and the other is leading with heart and purpose.

These ten topics support both themes throughout the book. The first topic in the book is being present and bringing engagement in the work place. This section specifies how leaders are visible in the work place and need to have a leader viewpoint and not a manager perspective. “To make genuine leadership the new norm in our schools, school leaders need to invest in relationships.” (pg. 19) The best outcome to improving this area was describe as listening more, asking questions, lunch time with students, celebrating in public, and spending enough time out of the office and in the school community. “Be intentional about every conversation and exchange.” (pg. 30).

 The second topic correlates with the first because in order to create a positive culture in the school, a leader must be visible. “Culture feels so entrenched in tradition that no change seems possible.” (pg.34). The solution to bland culture norms is described in the book by highlighting the importance of how staff feel and perceptions they experience. The one who can best model these practices is the leader himself (pg. 33). This chapter’s solution to creating a positive culture is  C. U. L.T. U.R.E “communication uncovers learning, transparency ultimately reveals everything.” (pg. 34).  A leader must feed into the people, define a proper status, share communication with families, name interns of the week, and celebrate the small things (pg. 36-37).  This opens communication for the school community and brings parental involvement.

Topics three and four also merge into similarities three being building relationships and four being partnership with the community. The authors in this book repeatedly emphasizes how building relationships with staff members is important. In these two chapters they cover the importance of relationships with students and those in the community which include parents and families of students. The book speaks on collaborating with teachers to get to know the students. Simply asking questions or asking teachers to share great efforts students have made. The book stated a simple way to engage with staff, students, and parents is shining light and communicating the best works of students to their families. This brings staff engagement by showing support to their teaching success but it also engages with the families and students (pg.57). The book also speaks on the importance of attending events. The authors share viewpoints on participating in events and how being present can show support and bring community engagement.

Following, the next two hacks being five and six were centered in the importance of connecting and the community. “Being proactive in all aspects of schooling should be the default, but addressing the community’s hot button topics can get people moving in the right direction.” (pg.73-74). Hack five focused on student voices and the importance of hearing their opinion with topics which are never really brought from students. The book mentions options like google forms and using social media to bring the community to participate in conversations and in a way bring guilt to through postings to have them be more active in the school. Another way the book prompted meaningful interaction was social media shining and honoring students through social media norms. The book on page 70 stated that little raffles like t-shirt giveaways and gift certificates will bring communication and engagement and keep school conversations continuous on social media.  Hack six falls right into this because it covers how to create a school that works for kids and not only the adults. This chapter spoke on how students can have a voice by having a say in curriculum and participating in committees.  The solution presented to help students stay focused and motivated was allowing them to be part of the learning process. Also giving them time to have a say in their learning and allowing them to develop new learning strategies which work for them.

Continuing, hack seven covers content on hiring the superstars needed to implement best practices of community and relationship building. “Hiring excellent staff is one of the most important things we can do for students.” (pg.105) Part of bringing great staff ties with the two main themes of this book. On page 99 the book has a section on less questions and more conversations when hiring new teachers for the team. The goal of having and holding conversations and avoiding common interview questions are to allow flexible and judicious thinking (pg. 99). The authors also emphasize the importance of intergrading new staff members and getting them involved. Part of getting staffed members involved falls into hack eight where the book covers the importance pushing teachers to engage in their own learning. Repeatedly the book covers the importance of community in various aspects. This hack focused on the educators and how they can be encouraged to push for new ideas and stay connected in methods of teaching while working together and building a teacher community. 

Additionally, the last two topics bring the common themes in the book to conclusion. Hack nine being collaborate and learn, which covered common way to collaborate with staff members during professional developments. The authors brought insight on how teachers can collectively learn together and from one another by not having a one size fits all professional development (pg. 121). “All educators should have the power to personalize the professional development they participate in, even when it is collaborative and individualize in nature.” (pg.121).The last hack covered changing the mindset of all educators, both authors expressed how this can be done by being supportive. Following the two themes of the book they concluded that involving the parents thinking and student thinking will allow for the deficit mindset to be changed into positive thoughts, which later brings problem solving solutions into the school environment.

Finally, the book merges the themes under an element of being like water. “When we reach the goal where the water has perfectly permeated the space for optimal growth and nourishment, we create schools that students, staff, and parents love…”. (pg.150) The authors concluded with building relationships by opening streams that channel meaningful relationships.  They also finalize with making sure leaders understand to build a sense of community by nourishing parties to lead with heart and conversation (pg. 149).

Strengths and Weaknesses 

This book allows for perfect implementation of important topics in education. There are three strengths that stood out the most. One being that it gives teacher perspectives from different viewpoints, two it brings examples, and three it gives tips and steps on how to implement the suggested methods immediately.

This leadership book brings innovative and modern solutions to common problems in education. It also supports the different ‘Hacking’ series previous to this fifth addition. I do not think this book lacks information covered in the specific topics spoken on, but the book did not cover a wide range of themes. Instead it covered ten specific topics the authors used to culture their schools with the same reoccurring themes. It gave great examples, but if one weakness had to be pointed out, it would be getting parents to comment on some of the topics from the book. The book had many teacher examples and perspectives but having student and parent perspectives would give some strategies extra support.

“Comparison to Fullan’s “Leading In A Culture of Change”

Both of these books had similar content of conversations, but different ways of presenting the information. Some of the similarities both books had were great examples, both promoted culture change, and both gave specific details to create a strong community. The books were both similar and focused on relationships and having open conversations.

Although Fullan’s book was centralized on breaking down the framework of leadership to equip teachers and staff members. Sanfelippo’s and Sinanis’ book was focused on empowering teachers, students, and parents. Both books could be said to have covered similar content but Sanfelippo’s and Sinanis’ included the community outside the school walls.

Both books covered the importance of professional development, Sanfelippo’s and Sinanis focused on collaborative work and allowing teachers to give input on what content to cover, and Fullan’s like Sanfelippo’s and Sinanis book focused on allowing teachers to share what works and what doesn’t work. Both of these books had great content which helps support leaders in schools and outside of school settings.

References

Fullan, M. (2009). The challenge of change: start school improvement now! Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Sanfelippo, J., & Sinanis, T. (2016). Hacking leadership: 10 ways great leaders inspire learning that teachers, students, and parents love. Cleveland, OH: Times 10 Publications.

To top


Book Review: Lead Like a Pirate

By Demetria C Johnson

According to dictionary.com, synonyms for a pirate are adventurer, daredevil, hero, heroine, opportunist and voyager. Being a leader in the education arena you must be a daredevil and an opportunist, ready to steer through the many changes that comes with leading. A leader must be ready to navigate through policies, procedures, behaviors and people to service one of our greatest commodities, students. Each part of being a Pirate leader has a compass to guide you. Also, there are cannonballs to avoid along the way. This book gives leader a guide on how to navigate leadership in a manner that requires guts and will. PIRATE leader lets sail out and be ready to ANCHOR our conversation.

Passion

Being passionate about a thing or person can become contagious and infectious. A leader must have their own passion and willing to share it with their professional environment. A leader who brings their passion for their students to succeed and their teachers to be their best will infect the entire environment and bring excitement to building. Once a leader knows their passion, they must be willing to help others identify and tap into their passion. Sharing your passion with your staff will build relationship and connection. The compass of passion is the commitment of being completely and totally into the mission. The cannonball to avoid in passion is being complaint of just doing what you are told without deep understanding. 

Immersion

Being immerse in a task requires diving deep into a task whole heartedly. Continuing to learn a skill and never feeling you know it all. Also, being immerse in the staff and students requires spending time with them. Taking time to eat lunch with the staff or going to recess with the students will allow you opportunities to learn them on a more personal level. Immersion yourself in the content of the curriculum requires a leader to know all they can about the standards and curriculum. This will help you understand the requirements of being a teacher as well as expectations of the students. Time is a precious commodity in the education world. Leaders must learn to delegate and allow others to assist in the daily running of the school.  The compass to guide a leader in immersion is credibility. A leader must have a deep understanding and continues to grow deeper. The cannonballs to avoid is being a counterfeit. Presenting a dog and pony show as if you understand and believe in a process but don’t and have not commitment.

Rapport

Trust is instrumental to the success of any organization. Having rapport with people is building a healthy relationship. Health relationships requires trust at its core. How do you build trust with people who do not know you or not happy that you are coming to their organization? A leader must take the time to get to know the staff and allow the staff to get to know them. In the education world time is valuable. The leader has to be creative and use the resources available to them; the staff and the students. Simply conversations with everyone that is involved with the running of a school. Having conversations with the custodians, parents, cafeteria staff, students, bus drivers, teachers, paraprofessionals, office staff and especially the students. Using technology is a safe way is a great way to continue to build trust. Simple things as having an app that everyone can use that will show the happenings of the school to sending home a newsletter monthly that includes birthdays, anniversaries and special events of stakeholders. The compass to guide a leader with rapport are having true empathy and understanding for everyone and being dedicated to the mission of the crew. The cannonballs to avoid are being callous, not caring for the members of your crew and competition, only wanting to win and not care about the mission.

Transformation

If you want different you have to think differently and act differently. Transformation take courage and creativity, thinking outside of tradition. A leader cannot be satisfied with mediocre or status quo. Setting the tone at the beginning of the school year is vital. A leadership team must have a “whatever it takes” mentality to transform from the traditional ways to something new and exciting. During this transformation, involving everyone allows people to feel valuable and apart. When a person feels they are valuable, they will go above and beyond the status quo. Allowing students to express their needs and desires helps them to buy in to the transformation that is happening. When Pirate leaders transform their practices there is a ripple effect throughout. The compass to guide you in transformation is courage. A leader must be willing to take risk for growth and make a stand in order to make the environment better. The cannonballs to avoid is being a coward. A leader must be willing to fight for what is right.

Enthusiasm

Fun is ok! Fun is encouraged. Fun is a must. A leader sets the tone for the building. Every day and every event make not be “fun,” however with a little imagination and creativity you can make it fun and enjoyable. The leader is responsible for the positivity in the building. A leader must have enthusiasm about every detail of the school even when its difficult and boring. Being silly is ok and the students will appreciate you and respect you the same. Enthusiasm shows the teachers and students that school can be fun and exciting. If you enjoy your workplace, you will go to work and be more productive. The compass to guide you is be captivating or willing to step outside the box. Throw away the box and enjoy and have fun. The cannonballs to avoid is being clinical or overanalyzing every detail, situation and decision. Do not be afraid to try something new.

Coach Like Pirate: Anchor Conversation

According to dictionary.com anchor is someone or something that provides strength and support. Conversation is the anchor in healthy relationships. In order for anchor conversation to be effective and work, a leader must believe that each member of their staff is capable of making magic in their classroom. Not have cookie cutter, pretending, dog and pony show work but authentic and unique magic. ANCHOR conversation is

A: Appreciation

N: Notice the Impact

C: Collaborative Conversations/Captain-Directed Conversations

H: Honor Voice and Choice

O: Offer Support

R: Reflection

Each part of ANCHOR conversation is important. Words are powerful. Words matter and words change people for better or worse. Exploring each part of ANCHOR will help leaders better understand how to improve their conversations with staff and peers. The three goals of an Anchor conversation are the staff knows they are valued, they each add value to the team, and they are willing to push practice forward.

Appreciation

A simple “thank you,” can brightening a person day and give them a little push to continue. A leader must be intentional with their appreciation to the staff. Also, a leader should be specific in their appreciation. With the specific praise give a why and attach it to best practices, school goals, and student learning. Use positive body language with a smile to convey your message of appreciation. Avoid being fake. Do not use judgemental language or tones when conveying your appreciation. Appreciate everyone in some way. Do not stay focus on the same people and forgetting others who may not be as outspoken or visual.

Notice of Impact

Noticing allows a leader to point out the decisions a teacher makes that impacts learning in a positive way. Helping a teacher articulate why they taught a lesson in a particular manner makes them cognizant of their decisions. A leader must share the specifics that they noticed a teacher do and then share the impact of the decision. It is important to link the decision to the student learning and school goals. Be encouraging to continue the use of the decision. Remember to use positive body language, enthusiasm and upbeat word. “Thank you” goes a long way, even when a teacher is just doing their job. Avoid being general on the noticing. Do not give false and fake praise. Always avoid judgmental language and tones.

Collaborative Conversations

Collaboration is when there is a dialoged, sharing of ideas and brainstorming. No one person is an expert in teaching all students in a building. However, everyone as a team that have ideas that can reach majority if not all students. Having a collaborative conversation are opportunities to talk about good teaching. A good collaboration starts with appreciation. Begin asking questions to foster reflection and learning from the staff. Actively listening to the response of the teacher and ask more clarifying questions for complete understanding. Provide new ideas with encouragement to try them with an open mind and observations to reflect. Always close with a thank you. Avoid assuming what it may have looked like, this is why questioning is important. The teacher should be talking equally or more than the leader, this is true collaboration. Lastly, do not try to mask criticism as question. Leaders are building healthy relationships and trust.

Captain-Directed Conversations

There are times when collaboration is not helpful, and the leader needs to direct the conversation. There are times when a teacher needs teaching. During this conversation the leader must define the practice that was missing. Giving the teacher a specific explanation not just use education jargon. Show examples of the practice. Teachers are visual learners as well. Also, practice helps make a concept concrete and understandable. Justify the change or new concept by explaining how it impacts student’s learning. Make sure the teacher understands the change by allow practice and examples with a follow-up visit for reflection. Remember to say, “thank you.” During the captain-directed conversation make sure its based on practices that needs improvement not something a leader doesn’t like. Also, do not allow the captain-directed conversation be evaluative. Building a relationship requires trust. The teacher must understand that these conversations are to help them grow not deflate them.

Honor Voice and Choice

Allowing teachers to teach has been a teacher’s dream. Many teacher’s creativity has been snuffed out because of unrealistic timelines created. Also, wanted every class to be on the same topic, on the same day, at the same time is unrealistic and closed-minded thinking. Honoring the voice and the choice of the teacher allows the teacher the opportunity to evaluate the feedback and unleash their creativity and talent to effectively deliver the lesson. Giving teachers this power provides them an opportunity to grow. The teacher will feel a sense of belonging and will go above and beyond to better themselves for the sake of their students. A leader must be open to all ideas event the ones that are different from theirs. Also, a leader should not fake liking a decision of a teacher when they don’t. It is always best practice to be honest with reasons to maintain an honest and healthy relationship.

Offer Support

What is perfection? Perfection is not for teaching students. Consistency and constant learning are how an effective teacher continues to improve their craft of teaching. Allowing teachers to think outside of the box and provide them with support opens the door for amazing growth.  Leaders should be a resource to the staff. Teachers, parents and students should feel comfortable enough to bring ideas and brainstorm current practices to the leadership with out any hesitation. Leaders should be careful not to offer support they are unable to provide. Also, a leader must follow through their commitment.

Reflection

            After each coaching session, conversation, a leader should reflect on the three goals;’1. Did the teacher feel valued?

Did the teacher find value in the conversation?

Did the conversation push the teacher’s thinking to push their practice forward?

If there is not a resounding yes, then recognize the cannonball and be read to adjust before the next conversation. Self-reflection is critical in being an effective leader. As a leader we must take the time to slow down and improve our own practice as we are helping others improve theirs.

“Lead Like a Pirate” is a guide to help; any person in leadership or inspiring to reevaluate their thinking about leadership. The guide allows simple practices that can change the atmosphere of a building from drab to excitement. Being a captain of a crew requires constant growing and building of self as you build others. If you are ready for a voyage of a lifetime, hoist your sale, pull up your anchor, grab your map and set sail for an adventure.

Strengths and Weaknesses

The theme of a pirate and crew allows this book to be an easy read and follow. The comparison allows for the reader to relate and put themselves as a captain. The idea of helping a leader navigate through leadership using terms that are easy to understand helps the reader follow the format laid out before them. Acronyms are an easy way to remember information. PIRATE and ANCHOR are two sets of acronyms the author uses to allow the reader to remember key lessons being shared.

Another strength is the relevant examples the authors gave. These examples are not far fetched or unobtainable. The authors gave examples that one can follow and use today. This allowed the book to read with ease and understandability.

A weakness in the book is the practices are spread throughout the book. Having one section for the practices for easy reference could be helpful. This will allow the leader to refer to certain activities that can implemented through the school year.

Comparison

Leading in a Culture of Change by Michael Fullan, has some similar theories on administration and leadership. Fullan gives five components to leadership for reinforcing positive change. Moral purpose, understanding change, building relationship, knowledge and creation sharing and coherence making are the five components of his Framework for Leadership. Included in his framework he discusses personal traits a leader must possess are energy, enthusiasm, and hopefulness. When leaders possess the five components and stay the course, they inspire others to operate in the five components. Both books share the ideology that the leader sets the tone of the building. Even in challenging moments of change, how the leader responds to the change and delivers the information to the staff determines how the staff reacts. Enthusiasm is a common theme between the authors. Leaders have to be passionate about leading and the people they are leading. The purpose of being a leader needs to be defined within that person prior to becoming a leader. Positive, healthy relationships is imperative for a leader to be success.

Written differently, both books are conveying the same message. A leader must be willing to continue to grow themselves. They must be assessible, approachable ad relatable. A leader must be willing to share their knowledge as well as be teachable. Leaders must provide an atmosphere of excitement, fun and community.

References

Burgess, S., Houf. B., (2017). Lead Like a Pirate. San Diego: Dave Burgess Consulting, Inc.

Fullan, M., (2001). Leading in a Culture of Change. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass

To top


Book Review: The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You (10th Anniversary Edition)

By Bryanna Nunez

John C. Maxwell is an American pastor, speaker, and author who has written several books focused on leadership. One of his most famous and respected books is The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will Follow You. This book inspires people from all around the world to embrace change and become the best leaders possible. Maxwell is a reliable source of information. After leading several churches, teaching, and running a hugely successful company that provides leadership education and training to various businesses and Fortune 500 companies, he has much to share.

The central premise of this book revolves around twenty-one necessary laws of leadership that must be implemented to achieve success. Although some laws may seem simplistic or logical, often it is the easiest of concepts that are overlooked. These laws all highlight the significance of the leader-follower relationship. This core idea impacts each law allowing for each to combine to create a masterful leader.

Maxwell’s book provides a structure and blueprint that can be followed to create a successful business and inspire all others involved in the process. This book stresses the importance of leadership ability, influence, dedication, hard work, and open communication. A person’s potential to be effective is based on their leadership ability; this text increases this potential, therefore raising the lid. One way to build this potential is to increase trust. Maxwell focuses on the importance of trust and how employees garner it. Trust sits on the foundation of fairness, good judgment, and honesty. All are signs of strong leadership.

 Leadership is measured by influence. The ability to influence others and have them follow and trust in you is not a feat that is easily mastered. Regardless of title or position, it is possible to carry influence. Inspiring others to participate is at the heart of this skillset.  Influence is not instantly granted; it must be earned through a combination of character, intuition, ability, personality, knowledge, and the connections to other relevant or meaningful individuals.

Maxwell also emphasizes the importance of dedication when working toward greatness. He refers to this dedication as the process. This process is the development of becoming a great leader, and accomplishing what must be done and improving every day. Ongoing lifelong daily learning must also be put into action in order to fulfill this process. This journey of success is not one that can be easily accomplished; it requires effort, forethought, and a vision for the future.

Main Themes

Maxwell’s central theme is to remind the reader that authentic leadership is cultivated over time. He states that “Leadership develops daily, not in a day” (Page 3). He guides this pattern of leadership by focusing on three different forms of investments, investment in the future, investment in oneself, and an investment in others.

One of the most important and fiercest themes of the text is the significance of reliable, dependable relationships in leadership. These bonds include leader-peer relationships as well as leader- subordinate relationships. The main focus of Maxwell’s philosophy is to enhance employee-subordinate relations in order to increase productivity and build influence. These relationships are tied into the investment in other. Investing in others proves to be a cornerstone of Maxwell’s manifesto, and be can be seen in several of his laws. Three laws, in particular, support the importance of investing in others. These laws are the law of buy-in, the law of connection, and the law of addition. 

The law of buy-in states, “People buy into the leader, then the vision” (Page 5).  Once leaders establish this connection, they will be able to influence people to support their given vision. When a leader is trusted and respected, they will be followed more than a leader who only has a title. Another law that supports adding value to others is the law of connection. The law of connection focuses on an emotional connection forged through trust. Maxwell preaches that trust is the secret to forging significant personal relationships and establishing credibility. This same theme is seen in the law of addition.

Maxwell states that “Leaders add value by serving others” (Page 46). The Law of Addition focuses on leaders adding value to others by creating significant relationships, and a layer of trust with those around them. These qualities make the acceptance of a leader’s influence more likely and predictable. Moreover, leaders can add values to others by emboldening and inspiring others with encouragement and knowledge. When individuals are encouraged and empowered through different avenues of training, education, and delegation, they tend to be more productive and effective, frequently becoming better leaders themselves. A sign of a good leader is the ability to mold and create good leaders, as they enrich themselves; they also enrich the company and the influence the leader has in the business.

Another pivotal investment Maxwell refers to is the investment in the future. One leader has cemented their relationship with their employees; they must strive for future success by focusing on various strategies to lead a team. This success can be supported and encouraged by the laws of priorities, victory, and momentum. The law of priorities highlights the principles of returns through the three Rs. The three Rs are: What will allow for the greatest reward? What is required and must be accomplished? What will deliver the most significant benefit? The author suggests the implementation of the Pareto Principle. This principle states. “If you focus your attention on the activities that rank in the top 20 percent in terms of importance, you will have an 80 percent return on your effort” (Maxwell, Page 209). In essence, Maxwell suggests focusing only on the essential and main tasks at hand to reap the most significant rewards.

Another pivotal law regarding investing in the future is the law of victory. The law of victory revolves around the importance of responsibility, commitment, and dedication. A successful, effective, and productive team requires a unified vision with a diverse set of skills and empowered employees. Real victory cannot be achieved withouta leader who takes responsibility for their team, makes necessary sacrifices, and showcases real dedication. This concept translates over to the law of momentum. Maxwell states that many times, momentum is the only thing that makes the difference between winning and losing” (Page 197). Momentum allows a leader to thrive, inspire subordinates to reach beyond their abilities, and instill meaningful change. Without momentum, companies may stall out, morale may be damaged, and small problems exasperated. A true leader is tasked with creating and directing momentum. Momentum can be created through verbal and written praise and acknowledging accomplishments. Maxwell cements this point saying, “The more you reward success, the more people will strive for it” (Page 206).

Other than investing in others and the future, it is vital to invest in oneself. If a leader is not confident, skilled, or empowered by their distinctive character, they are not ready to lead and inspire others. Once a leader has managed their external development (ability to navigate new software) and internal development (self-confidence), they are equipped to lead and help others. Leaders are not born; they are made with time, effort, and self-investment. This concept is at the core of the law of process and the law of influence. The law of process focuses on the concept of time. Leadership and the development of efficient leadership are accomplished with time, dedication, and commitment. A great leader continues to learn and strive to better themselves every day.

Additionally, Maxwell notes, “The true measure of leadership is influence – nothing more, nothing less” (Page 11). This is the centralized premise for the law of influence. Leadership requires more than a title, a position, or a skill set. A true leader builds relations with others, is experienced, capable, knowledgeable, and exhibits character. Throughout history, there have been countless people without title or position who exhibited character and knowledge and were able to influence many people in the world. Maxwell can address many fundamental essential ideas regarding authentic leadership by focusing on these meaningful themes.

Key Quotes

John C Maxwell has various key quotes in his book. These are some of the most powerful ones.

“Leaders touch a heart before they ask for a hand.”(Maxwell, Page 113 ). This quote signifies the importance of communicating care and listening to employees. Subordinates will not care to follow or respect a reader until they know they can trust their leader’s hearts and what they stand for. When an employee is made aware of what drives a leader, and know what they care about, then they will not follow them and learn from them. This the law of connection.

Another relevant quote from Maxwell is the following. “Many people view leadership the same way they view success, hoping to go as far as they can, to climb the ladder, to achieve the highest position possible for their talent. But contrary to conventional thinking, I believe the bottom line in leadership isn’t how far we advance ourselves but how far we advance others. That is achieved by serving others and adding value to their lives” (Page 51). This quote relates to the law of addition that focuses on the importance of helping to create more leaders in order to propel them and the business at hand. When a leader helps to create other leaders, they can maximize output, effort, and success. 

An additional essential quote from Maxwell’s book regards the importance of leadership. “Anyone can steer the ship, but it takes a leader to chart the course” (Page 45). This quote relays that a true leader must be able to devise a plan and create an inspiring and meaningful path regardless of challenges that may lie ahead.

Moreover, another quote found in this text address the need to prioritize. “First, when we are busy, we naturally believe that we are achieving. However, busyness does not equal productivity. Activity is not necessarily accomplishment. Second, prioritizing requires leaders to continually think ahead, to know what is important, to know what’s next, to see how everything relates to the overall vision. That’s hard work. Third, prioritizing causes us to do things that are at the least uncomfortable and sometimes downright painful” (Page 207). Maxwell enforces the importance of using time wisely. It is pivotal for a great leader to set their priorities in order to receive the most reward, benefit, and pleasure possible. Without prioritizing, time and benefits may be lost.

A final meaningful quote from this text relates to persistence. “If you want to be a leader, the good news is that you can do it. Everyone has the potential, but it isn’t accomplished overnight. It requires perseverance” (Maxwell, Page, 33).  This quote reminds the reader that anyone and everyone can be a successful leader. This is true as long as people are willing to put in the effort, time, passion, and dedication regardless of the obstacles.

This text is filled with a sundry of valuable and meaningful quotes these are only a small highlight of the inspiring text by Maxwell. 

Strengths and Weaknesses

Maxwell’s inspiring text is genuinely motivational and can be beneficial to many attempting to become more efficient leaders. In terms of strengths, this book has many. There is a solid reason that Maxwell has sold nearly a billion books over his career; they offer wisdom and that people trust. This book is no different. The author can share meaningful, relevant anecdotes to help clarify to the reader as to the message of his writing. Additionally, this book is read like a map to success by being broken down into the twenty-one laws. These laws and their divide allow a reader to revisit a topic or concept quickly when the situation sees fit. 

Moreover, Maxwell’s personal experience flows into the book crediting his words as reliable and dependable. His words provoke introspection and thought regarding qualities that can be improved upon. The author does a superb job of inspiring self-reflection in terms of self-impact, on others and business in general. The accompanying assessments are an accurate tool for growth as well. Although this text was originally published ten years ago, the themes of this work still ring true. Maxwell teaches that it is essential to be an effective leader and that everyone is capable of this task. This book can be appreciated and enjoyed by those in professional settings as well as those who need it personally.

In terms of weaknesses, Maxwell’s book as inspiring as it maybe is also flawed.  Maxwell speaks at length about organizational and project management and may neglect other areas. Additionally, Maxwell seems to self-promote in his book and focus on many of his own experiences and achievements as opposed to facts and statistics. These stories pull away from useful information. This lack of statistics leads to a heavy focus on anecdotes and often finds the content redundant and repetitive.

Maxwell’s book also often creates laws out of trite and common sense concepts that do not need a chapter to follow. Many readers may find his book trivial if they are in search of hard numbers, facts, skills, and new ideas to better their leadership capabilities. This text focuses on concepts that have been addressed and acknowledged to succeed for a significant amount of time. That being said, these books can be helpful and meaningful to millions of individuals.

Comparison to Fullan

Maxwell’s text spotlights the importance of an efficient leader who can forge relationships, create a plan, and inspire others to follow.  Fullan’s text is similar to Maxwell’s, as it also focuses on the importance of collaboration. Additionally, Fullan’s text, like Maxwell’s, is easy to read, understand, and implement.

Maxwell creates a guide with steps and rules. At the same time, Fullan focuses on the main idea of various effective tactics to be a successful leader.   Both books promote successful leadership and share anecdotes throughout their pages. Either book will be able to benefit and inspire a future leader. Both Maxwell and Fullan address the importance of change and embracing that change both as a company and a leader. 

Fullan’s text is more related to education and leadership. In contrast, Maxwell addresses education but tends to focus on leadership as a whole. Additionally, Maxwell focuses more on employee management and how to increase success and profits. Fullan also describes different leadership styles and how they are equipped to lead change. Maxwell does not address differentstyles; instead, he considers the readers and the leaders to be similar in their capability to succeed. Both authors focus on the importance of healthy, confident, connected leadership in order to increase efficiency, whether in a school or a business.

Maxwell’s text, although sprinkled with flaws, is designed to aid all individuals to succeed and become remarkable leaders. It is a book filled with wisdom, structure, and guidance to make this dream a reality. It has been considered an essential reference for a decade. It stands to be thought of as a necessary read for all readers for decades to come.

References

Fullan, M. (2009). The challenge of change: start school improvement now! Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin.

Maxwell, J. C. (n.d.). The 21 Irrefutable Laws of Leadership: Follow Them and People Will     Follow You; Revised and Updated 10th Anniversary Edition. S.l.: Thomas Nelson.

To top



Latest Employment Opportunities Posted on NASET 

* Chief Executive Officer – St. Coletta of Greater Washington is seeking an experienced Chief Executive Officer to lead and manage the organization while achieving educational and operational goals. This person will be responsible for strategically growing St. Coletta with an eye toward achieving success not only for the school, but for the children and adults that benefit from their services.To Learn more – Click here

* Asst Supt – Exceptional Children – The Assistant Superintendent for Special Education Services is a critical leadership role that directly affects the acceleration of improved student outcomes for GCS’s 10,534 students with special needs. This role directs, monitors and strengthens programs and ensures all services are implemented within federal, state, and local regulations. To learn more – Click here

* Education Specialist – We are always looking for compassionate, exceptional educators to join our SPED Team (grades K-5 or 6-8) ! You’ll work collaboratively with your colleagues to drive the achievement of all students in your grade level. You will be encouraged and supported to lead engaging, personalized, and rigorous lessons that integrate our four pillars: Heart, Smart, Think, and Act. To learn more – Click here

* High School Special Education Teacher – New Trier High School is a large, high-achieving school in the northern suburbs of Chicago with two campuses in Northfield and Winnetka, Illinois. The outstanding Special Education department is large and comprehensive. To learn more – Click here

* Special Education Teacher PreK-12 – Essential duties are: aid each student, consistent with his or her abilities and educational needs to develop competence in the basic learning skills, progress on the basis of achievement, qualify for further education and/or employment, develop ethical standards of behavior and participate in society as a responsible family member and citizen. To learn more – Click here

* Assistant Principal – Avondale House is a 501(c)(3) not-for-profit agency that provides, educational services to individuals with autism, a day habilitation program for young adults, where clients receive training in daily living skills and pre-vocational activities, employment services for those with disabilities and four residential homes for adults unable to live in their own home. This position will assist the Principal in order to maintain smooth operations, administratively and pro-grammatically, of the Avondale House School. To learn more – Click here

* Exceptional Student Education, Teacher – Responsible for the educational leadership of students placed in exceptional education programs, including gifted students and students with disabilities.  This position encompasses the three standards included in Teacher Professional Expectations in School Board Policy, which are high student achievement, safe learning environment, and effective and efficient operations.  To learn more – Click here

* Academic Resource Center Math Specialist/Teacher – Academic Resource Center (ARC) Mathematics Specialist/Teacher is a teacher leader who is responsible for supporting effective Grade 9 through 12 mathematics instruction and student learning with a particular focus on students with service plans and exceptional needs. To learn more – Click here

* Diverse Learner Teacher – We are seeking experienced full-time Diverse Learner Teachers (K-8 Grades) to join CICS Avalon, CICS Basil, and CICS Washington Park Campuses for the 2020-2021 school year. A Diverse Learner Teacher holds primary responsibility for providing academic, emotional, and physical services for students who require additional support to thrive within the school’s core academic program. To learn more – Click here

* Special Education Teacher – We are looking for highly motivated and skilled Special Education teachers to join our team at District of Columbia Public Schools (DCPS). DCPS serves more than 51,000 students through the e?orts of approximately 4,000 educators in 117 schools. DCPS intends to have the highest-performing, best paid, most satis?ed, and most honored educator force in the nation and a distinctive central o?ce sta? whose work supports and drives instructional excellence and signi?cant achievement gains for DCPS students. To learn more- Click here

* Special Education Teacher – Environmental Charter Schools is seeking a talented and dynamic Special Education Teacher who is passionate about preparing low-income students of color for college success. The mission of the Environmental Charter Schools (ECS) is to reimagine public education in low-income communities of color to prepare conscious, critical thinkers who are equipped to graduate from college and create a more equitable and sustainable world. To learn more – Click here

To top


Acknowledgements

Portions of this or previous month’s NASET’s Special Educator e-Journal were excerpted from:

  • Center for Parent Information and Resources
  • Committee on Education and the Workforce
  • FirstGov.gov-The Official U.S. Government Web Portal
  • Journal of the American Academy of Special Education Professionals (JAASEP)
  • National Collaborative on Workforce and Disability for Youth
  • National Institute of Health
  • National Organization on Disability
  • Substance Abuse and Mental Health Services Administration
  • U.S. Department of Education
  • U.S. Department of Education-The Achiever
  • U.S. Department of Education-The Education Innovator
  • U.S. Department of Health and Human Services
  • U.S. Department of Labor
  • U.S. Food and Drug Administration
  • U.S. Office of Special Education

    The National Association of Special Education Teachers (NASET) thanks all of the above for the information provided for this or prior editions of the Special Educator e-Journal


    To top

    Become a Member Today

    Join thousands of special education professionals and gain access to resources, professional development, and a supportive community dedicated to excellence in special education.

    Become a Member Today